1948
DOI: 10.1139/cjr48d-020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

THE ANATOMY OF MONODONTOMERUS DENTIPES BOH., AN ENTOMOPHAGOUS CHALCID

Abstract: The anatomy of the adult of Monodontomerus dentipes Boh., a chalcid parasite of sawfly cocoons in Europe and America, is described. An attempt is made to homologize the structures of this highly modified insect with those known in more generalized insects, in the hope of clarifying some questions of chalcid morphology which has been generally neglected by entomologists. The nomenclature employed is of a kind generally acceptable to students of morphology, an effort being made to eliminate the use of terms spec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the apocritan taxa examined except S. cinctipes (Stephanidae), the lateral metafurcal arms are well developed, extending towards the metapleural apodemes in I. rufipes (Ibaliidae; Ronquist and Nordlander 1989) or even fusing with them as observed in M. fasciipennis (Megalyridae), A. striatus (Aulacidae), O. pulchella (Trigonalidae) and V. pensylvanica (Vespidae; Duncan 1939); the latter condition (character 41, state 2) was also observed in Apis mellifera (Apidae; Snodgrass 1942) and M. dentipes (Chalcidoidea; Bucher 1948). The anterior metafurcal arms are less conspicuous (except in S. cinctipes), as the metafurca lies close to the mesofurca (Duncan 1939); in Apoidea, the meso-and metafurcal arms are actually fused and the metafurco-mesofurcal muscles (27) are absent (Snodgrass 1942;Heraty et al 1994).…”
Section: The Metascutellum Paracoxal Sulci Metafurca and Mesospina mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the apocritan taxa examined except S. cinctipes (Stephanidae), the lateral metafurcal arms are well developed, extending towards the metapleural apodemes in I. rufipes (Ibaliidae; Ronquist and Nordlander 1989) or even fusing with them as observed in M. fasciipennis (Megalyridae), A. striatus (Aulacidae), O. pulchella (Trigonalidae) and V. pensylvanica (Vespidae; Duncan 1939); the latter condition (character 41, state 2) was also observed in Apis mellifera (Apidae; Snodgrass 1942) and M. dentipes (Chalcidoidea; Bucher 1948). The anterior metafurcal arms are less conspicuous (except in S. cinctipes), as the metafurca lies close to the mesofurca (Duncan 1939); in Apoidea, the meso-and metafurcal arms are actually fused and the metafurco-mesofurcal muscles (27) are absent (Snodgrass 1942;Heraty et al 1994).…”
Section: The Metascutellum Paracoxal Sulci Metafurca and Mesospina mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Scherbakov (1981) inferred that the fusion of T1 with the metapleura took place along the metapleural sulci, making the lines of fusion indistinguishable from them. Bucher (1948), examining Mono-dontomerus dentipes (Chalcidoidea), placed the lines of fusion in the same positions, but considered the epimera to be incorporated in the propodeum. In I. rufipes, the anteroventral corners of 'area(s) 98' actually project anterolaterally (L. Vilhelmsen personal observation), separating the dorsal 'area(s) 97' (Ronquist and Nordlander 1989) from the rest of the metapleura.…”
Section: The Fusion Of the Metapleura With T1 And The Association Bementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Terms used to describe adult morphology are based largely on Graham (1969) with some deviation to follow terms used by Snodgrass (1911), Bucher (1948) and Masner (1980). The term pedicel and prepectus are preferred to the terms pedicellus and postspiracular sclerite, respectively (Fig.…”
Section: Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of microtrichia on the lateral margins of the sulcus suggests that it has been formed by the invagination of the dorsal part of the hypostomal bridge and that the internal ridges fused as a single median structure. A median sulcus is present also in Schlettererius , Aulacus , and Vespula (Duncan 1939), whereas the condition in Ibalia (Ronquist & Nordlander 1989), Monodontomerus (Chalcidoidea; Bucher 1948), Aleiodes (Braconidae; Ross 1937), Stenobracon (Braconidae; Alam 1951), and Apis (Snodgrass 1942) resembles that of Xiphydria . Orthogonalys has a narrow median area between the post‐genae, delimited by two lines continuous with the hypostomal sulci; there are no conspicuous internal ridges corresponding to these lines, however.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%