"The Ancestors Within"

Barker, Clare

doi:10.3828/jlcds.2013.11

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Tikao et al, (2009) documented oral histories and oral stories (such as Hyland's) and collectively analyses how these stories communicate te Ao M aori conceptualisations of blindness and disability. The literary analysis by Barker (2013) of Baby No-Eyes links blindness and disability to the wider context of wh anau well-being. Central to Baby No-Eyes is the link between M aori health and the land (and how experiences of colonialisation have disrupted this).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Central to Baby No-Eyes is the link between M aori health and the land (and how experiences of colonialisation have disrupted this). Both Tikao et al, (2009) and Barker (2013) draw on oral histories and cultural practices to communicate the value of wh anau members that extends beyond physical impairments. Tapping's short story is located within childhood experiences of kura (school), tangihanga (funerary practices) and wh anau (family).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Blindness is viewed as a gift, as a part of life, as a sign and blind people are viewed as no more or less valuable than fully sighted peers. Barker (2013) Of these 17 publications, only two generated data (c.f. retrospective audits and pre-collected data).…”

Section: Author and Title Short Synopsis And Relevancementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

What do we know about the intersection of being blind and being Māori in Aotearoa New Zealand? Taking an applied community psychology approach to a systematic review of the published literature

Graham

Masters‐Awatere

Cowan

2023

Community & Applied Soc Psy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Self‐determination and dignity are guaranteed rights for disabled persons under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. However, such rights have been slow to eventuate for Māori (Indigenous people of Aotearoa New Zealand). This paper brings together systematic fashion publications that currently exist regarding blindness and Māori, centring throughout Māori understandings of disability and blindness. We employed a structured approach alongside PRISMA protocols and reflexive dialogue. Included publications were quantitative data reviews, surveys, qualitative studies, literature reviews and works of fiction. For our analysis, we formulated a matrix that drew from Kaupapa Māori, applied community psychology and disability rights literature. This meant we made explicit where research practices included—and excluded—self‐determination, democratic participation and inclusion of both disabled and Māori. Our review highlights inconsistency across disciplines regarding self‐determination and democratic participation by both Māori and disabled key stakeholders. Our approach can be utilised across disciplines as a tool for considering the ways in which researchers uphold Indigenous self‐determination, disability rights and data sovereignty. Please refer to the Supplementary Material section to find this article's Community and Social Impact Statement.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%