2017
DOI: 10.1134/s1063776117030153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Andreev conductance in superconductor–insulator–normal metal structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At V/VΔ<0.3 obtained Te values slightly differ, which does not affect the results. But at low voltages there is a qualitative difference -the differential conductivity according to formula (4) changes linearly, which corresponds to experiment [17,18]. Equation ( 5) is similar to the calculation of Andreev current in [19].…”
Section: W II Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At V/VΔ<0.3 obtained Te values slightly differ, which does not affect the results. But at low voltages there is a qualitative difference -the differential conductivity according to formula (4) changes linearly, which corresponds to experiment [17,18]. Equation ( 5) is similar to the calculation of Andreev current in [19].…”
Section: W II Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Therefore, the single-electron current of the ideal NIS junction according to formula (3) at low voltages is only a small fraction of the total current, the contribution to which can due to the subgap Andreev current In+Is [13,16]. In the case of electrons scattering by magnetic ions, as established in [16,17], In is near zero and Is can be presented as…”
Section: W II Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…with three fitting parameters that should be selected from experiment [12]. An alternative approach is the Dynes model [13].…”
Section: Influence Of Permanent Magnetic Field On Conductivity Of Nis Junctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. IV curves of suspended Pd bolometer measured at 0.1 K and 0.16 K (red and blue), with and without radiation, and calculated for 0.179 K and 0.161 K IV curves of suspended SINIS bolometer with Cu absorber at 350 GHz irradiation measured at 0.1 K and comparison with calculation accounting for Andreev's current according to [26] presented in Fig. 5.…”
Section: B Suspended Bolometermentioning
confidence: 99%