1960
DOI: 10.1016/0029-5582(60)90023-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The angular distributions of the gamma radiation from the Li7(p,γ)Be8 reaction from Ep = 200 keV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

1968
1968
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5a together with previous results of Mainsbridge [16] (dotted curve) sphere phase differences between s-and p-waves, and ~ is an energy-independent background phase used as a free parameter; this background phase could arise from distant resonances, such as the giant dipole resonance [-4] at E e -~ 5 MeV (F ~-4 MeV) leading to ~ -30 ~ The parameters for the resonant and DC terms were obtained from Table 2. The results are shown by the solid curve in Figure 5a, for ~ = 25 ~ and verify the recent explanation [3] of the observed forward-backward anisotropy at Ep = 80 keV [1] as caused by the interference between the E1 amplitude due to the DC process and the M1 amplitude due to the low-energy tail of the ER = 441 keV resonance.…”
Section: Forward-backward Anisotropiessupporting
confidence: 76%
“…5a together with previous results of Mainsbridge [16] (dotted curve) sphere phase differences between s-and p-waves, and ~ is an energy-independent background phase used as a free parameter; this background phase could arise from distant resonances, such as the giant dipole resonance [-4] at E e -~ 5 MeV (F ~-4 MeV) leading to ~ -30 ~ The parameters for the resonant and DC terms were obtained from Table 2. The results are shown by the solid curve in Figure 5a, for ~ = 25 ~ and verify the recent explanation [3] of the observed forward-backward anisotropy at Ep = 80 keV [1] as caused by the interference between the E1 amplitude due to the DC process and the M1 amplitude due to the low-energy tail of the ER = 441 keV resonance.…”
Section: Forward-backward Anisotropiessupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The 6.05 MeV E0 transition from 16 O is present due to the 19 F(p, α) 16 O reaction on the fluorine content of the target. The 11 MeV peak contains M1 and E1 transitions in 28 Si.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is known that the 18.15 MeV transition has a very large (8:1) forward-backward anisotropy [16,17], which is caused by the interference of the E1 amplitude due to the direct capture process and the M1 amplitude of the 441 keV and 1030 keV resonances. We investigated their possible effects on the angular correlation of the e + -e − pairs as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transformations of these results into a channel spin (L S) co-upling scheme (rather than j-j coupling used so far), where the notation '+'lJ denotes the scattering state quantum numbers (where j = I + s), via the prescription in Seyler and Weller [14], are also presented in Table I. In the channel spin coupling notation, the p-wave Ml strengths are in a ratio of 1/5, for spins 1 and 2, respectively, within their statistical errors, as was seen by Mainsbridge [4] The results of fitting the data using only s-wave E1 and p-wave E2 radiations are summarized in Table II. All fits presented so far, except the slg El and pily M1 only fits, produced the same Legendre coefficients which resulted in identical cr(8)/Ao and As(8) curves. These curves are all plotted in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Indeed, previous work has been analyzed based on this assumption [3]. Prior to this, the strong 17.640 MeV [E~(lab) = 441 keV] resonance of sBe was shown to be a 1+ (T = 1) state formed via p-wave capture with subsequent M1 decay to the ground state of sBe [4]. Angular distribution data indicated that the two p-wave amplitudes, with channel spins 1 and 2, occurred in the ratio of 1 to 5 (which was not explained).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%