2020
DOI: 10.1080/14626268.2020.1802295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The anthropophagic studio: towards a critical pedagogy for interaction design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As researchers working in the field of HCI in an underdeveloped nation, we feel compelled to explore further this philosophical anthropophagy, as we have done in previous works (Van Amstel and Gonzatto, 2020, 2022). In this work, we aim at an envisioning type of conceptual contribution (MacInnis, 2011), hence, we structure our exploration with the five key elements of conceptual review papers [8] (Hulland, 2020): Phase 1 problematizes the user's concept in HCI.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As researchers working in the field of HCI in an underdeveloped nation, we feel compelled to explore further this philosophical anthropophagy, as we have done in previous works (Van Amstel and Gonzatto, 2020, 2022). In this work, we aim at an envisioning type of conceptual contribution (MacInnis, 2011), hence, we structure our exploration with the five key elements of conceptual review papers [8] (Hulland, 2020): Phase 1 problematizes the user's concept in HCI.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The perspective we are developing here rejoins these two threads under a third philosophical tradition: the postcolonial thinking of the third world (Fanon, 2007), which considers the implication of underdevelopment (Furtado, 1961; Prebisch, 2011) and the oppressed human ontology (Freire, 1987; Vieira Pinto, 1960). Vieira Pinto formulated his critique of human ontology by admiring, devouring, digesting, assimilating and celebrating existential phenomenology together with historical materialism, in what could be called an anthropophagic philosophical banquet (Van Amstel and Gonzatto, 2020). Based on this hybridization practice, Vieira Pinto developed a critique of ideology, consciousness, development, technology and education that made sense in Brazil (Vieira Pinto, 1960, 1969, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…O potencial do entrelaçamento da pedagogia Freireana com o Design é reconhecido, por exemplo, no surgimento do próprio Design Participativo escandinavo no Norte Global (Ehn, 1988;Gregory, 2003). E, recentemente, essa relação também vem sendo reivindicada como grande contribuição de um pensador do Sul Global para decolonizar o Design (Smith, 2020;van Amstel;Gonzatto, 2020, Salazar;Huybrechts, 2020;Schultz et al, 2020;Serpa et al, 2020).…”
Section: Aproximações Entre a Pedagogia Crítica Freireana E O Designunclassified