2015
DOI: 10.4081/hr.2015.5844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Anti-Factor Xa Range for Low Molecular Weight Heparin Thromboprophylaxis

Abstract: Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are now the mainstay option in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. In some patients receiving therapeutic doses of LMWH, activity can be measured by quantifying the presence of Anti-factor Xa (AFXa) for dose adjustment. However, currently there are no guidelines for LMWH monitoring in patients on thromboprophylactic, doses, despite certain patient populations may be at risk of suboptimal dosing. This review found that while the AFXa ranges for therapeut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
119
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
119
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Enoxaparin is a frequently prescribed LMWH and laboratory monitoring of its anticoagulant activity with anti‐Xa facilitates dose adjustments. The target anti‐Xa range for prophylactic dose enoxaparin at our center in South Africa is 0.2–0.6 IU/mL, which is in line with published recommendations . Enoxaparin has a bioavailability of 91%, is linearly absorbed after subcutaneous administration, and has a predictable non‐saturable, dose‐independent renal elimination rate .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Enoxaparin is a frequently prescribed LMWH and laboratory monitoring of its anticoagulant activity with anti‐Xa facilitates dose adjustments. The target anti‐Xa range for prophylactic dose enoxaparin at our center in South Africa is 0.2–0.6 IU/mL, which is in line with published recommendations . Enoxaparin has a bioavailability of 91%, is linearly absorbed after subcutaneous administration, and has a predictable non‐saturable, dose‐independent renal elimination rate .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…However, a target therapeutic range of 0.2 to 0.5 IU/mL is commonly reported for prophylaxis, whereas 0.5 to 0.8 IU/mL is suggested for treatment dosing. 17,18 When using an anti-Xa level to evaluate for an absence of effect, as done in this study, it is the presence of residual activity at the time of a planned invasive procedure that is of greatest clinical interest. We chose to compare our results against the peak target therapeutic ranges, because intuitively these levels suggest at least some degree of anticoagulant activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These pharmacokinetic properties allow for once‐ or twice‐daily administration without routine monitoring in most healthy individuals. However, patients with extreme body weights were excluded from early trials of LMWH and may warrant therapeutic drug monitoring . Low molecular weight heparins exhibit a small effect on the activated partial thromboplastin time and strongly inhibit factor Xa .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, peak anti–factor Xa (aFXa) levels may be utilized to monitor the efficacy and safety of enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis. The evidence surrounding aFXa monitoring in VTE prophylaxis does not provide clear guidance on goal ranges, but 0.2–0.5 unit/ml seems reasonable …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%