1981
DOI: 10.1016/s0092-1157(81)80068-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The antibody-binding-test, a useful method for quantitative determination of inactivated rabies virus antigen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1982
1982
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained on days 21 and 42 showed that the suckling mouse brain vaccine produced with the PV strain performed better (P<0.01) than the one produced with the CVS strain, although both had a very similar NIH potency titer. Actually, their relative potencies may not have been equivalent, since the NIH test has been shown to have very low reproducibility (8,9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results obtained on days 21 and 42 showed that the suckling mouse brain vaccine produced with the PV strain performed better (P<0.01) than the one produced with the CVS strain, although both had a very similar NIH potency titer. Actually, their relative potencies may not have been equivalent, since the NIH test has been shown to have very low reproducibility (8,9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has, however, led to only limited numbers of proposals for actual replacement. So far, the modified antibody binding test (ABT) (Barth et al, 1981;Barth et al, 1990) and the single radial diffusion test (SRD) (Ferguson and Schild, 1982;Ferguson et al, 1984;Ferguson and Heath, 1992) were proposed as alternatives. Their use is restricted to GP measurement by polyclonal antibodies and is not applicable to adjuvanted vaccines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, limited information is available on possible alternatives for the actual replacement of the mouse potency test (2,3,10,11) that would be independent of laboratory animal use, which causes most of the aforementioned problems. The alternative in vitro methods that have been considered include the modified antibody binding test (4,5), the single radial immuno-diffusion test (12,13), and ELISAs (1, 21,22,23,29,31). These methods can generally not be used for adjuvanted vaccines and were used to measure the GP content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%