2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00891.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The aortic ring model of angiogenesis: a quarter century of search and discovery

Abstract: The aortic ring model has become one of the most widely used methods to study angiogenesis and its mechanisms. Many factors have contributed to its popularity including reproducibility, cost effectiveness, ease of use and good correlation with in vivo studies. In this system aortic rings embedded in biomatrix gels and cultured under chemically defined conditions generate arborizing vascular outgrowths which can be stimulated or inhibited with angiogenic regulators. Originally based on the rat aorta, the aortic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
82
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 226 publications
(333 reference statements)
3
82
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative effect of MMRN2 in regulating angiogenesis may likely depend on the endogenous VEGF-A released by ECs when not added directly in the various tests (Roccaro et al, 2006), for instance the sprouting of novel vessels in aortic ring assays is highly dependent on endogenously released VEGF-A (Ligresti et al, 2011). Although the inhibition of EC motility was directly linked to MMRN2, it cannot be excluded that the striking effects in halting angiogenesis in vivo may also depend on its influence on other cell types that may be responsible for an amplification of the anti-angiogenic effects of this molecule (Anghelina et al, 2006;Nicosia, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative effect of MMRN2 in regulating angiogenesis may likely depend on the endogenous VEGF-A released by ECs when not added directly in the various tests (Roccaro et al, 2006), for instance the sprouting of novel vessels in aortic ring assays is highly dependent on endogenously released VEGF-A (Ligresti et al, 2011). Although the inhibition of EC motility was directly linked to MMRN2, it cannot be excluded that the striking effects in halting angiogenesis in vivo may also depend on its influence on other cell types that may be responsible for an amplification of the anti-angiogenic effects of this molecule (Anghelina et al, 2006;Nicosia, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The angioformative properties of the intimal endothelium can be further demonstrated by embedding isolated aortic endothelial cells in collagen gel or by treating them with angiogenic factors (Nicosia et al, 1994b). In addition rat carotid explants fail to generate an angiogenic response when completely de-endothelialized with a balloon catheter whereas control carotid arteries with an intact intimal endothelium produce microvessels from their ends of resection (Nicosia, 2009). These findings indicate that the intimal layer of the aortic wall plays a central role in the sprouting of the aortic explants.…”
Section: Origin Of Microvessels In Aortic Culturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bFGF, VEGF (Fig. 2) and many of the growth factors, cytokines and chemokines upregulated in aortic ring cultures stimulate the angiogenic response of the aortic rings when added as exogenous molecules to the system (Gelati et al, 2008;Aplin et al, 2010;Salcedo et al, 1999;Nicosia et al, 1994a;Nicosia, 2009).…”
Section: Angiogenesis In the Aortic Ring Model Is Induced By Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recapitulation of functional microvessels in vitro could provide a platform for the study of complex vascular phenomena. However, conventional in vitro microvessel assays, such as endothelial cell migration assays, endothelial tube formation assays, and rat and mouse aortic ring assays, are unable to recreate the in vivo microvessels with respect to three-dimensional (3D) geometry and continuous flow control [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] . Studies of microvessels using animal models and in vivo assays, such as corneal angiogenesis assay, chick chorioallantoic membrane angiogenesis assay, and Matrigel plug assay, are more time-consuming, high in cost, challenging with respect to observation and quantifications, and raise ethical issues 1,[9][10][11][12][13] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%