1990
DOI: 10.1016/0022-460x(90)90890-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The apparent mass of the seated human body in the fore-and-aft and lateral directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

16
81
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
16
81
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings seem partially consistent with the hypothesis of Shoenberger and Harris (1971) that the greatest exponents will occur at the whole-body resonance frequency; they determined exponents for vertical vibration at 3.5, 5, 7, 9, 11, 15, and 20 Hz and found that the exponent at 5 Hz (1.04) was significantly greater than that at 7, 15 and 20 Hz. The primary resonance frequencies for fore-and-aft, lateral and vertical whole-body vibration (without backrest) are in the region of 2.5, 2.0, and 4.0 Hz, respectively [24,25], which more-or-less coincide with the maximum exponent for fore-andaft vibration (at 2 Hz) and the maximum exponent for vertical vibration (at 4 Hz) in the present study. In the lateral direction, the study of Fairley and Griffin [25] had subjects with feet close together whereas in the present study the feet were further apart -this may have increased the resonance frequency of the body in the lateral direction in the present study and so a maximum exponent for lateral vibration in the 4 to 6 Hz range may also be associated (in some undefined way) with the biodynamic responses of the body during vibration.…”
Section: Fig 5 About Heresupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings seem partially consistent with the hypothesis of Shoenberger and Harris (1971) that the greatest exponents will occur at the whole-body resonance frequency; they determined exponents for vertical vibration at 3.5, 5, 7, 9, 11, 15, and 20 Hz and found that the exponent at 5 Hz (1.04) was significantly greater than that at 7, 15 and 20 Hz. The primary resonance frequencies for fore-and-aft, lateral and vertical whole-body vibration (without backrest) are in the region of 2.5, 2.0, and 4.0 Hz, respectively [24,25], which more-or-less coincide with the maximum exponent for fore-andaft vibration (at 2 Hz) and the maximum exponent for vertical vibration (at 4 Hz) in the present study. In the lateral direction, the study of Fairley and Griffin [25] had subjects with feet close together whereas in the present study the feet were further apart -this may have increased the resonance frequency of the body in the lateral direction in the present study and so a maximum exponent for lateral vibration in the 4 to 6 Hz range may also be associated (in some undefined way) with the biodynamic responses of the body during vibration.…”
Section: Fig 5 About Heresupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In the fore-and-aft and lateral directions there are resonances at about 1.5 and 3 Hz [25]. The present results show greatest subjective response to vertical vibration around 5 to 10 Hz and greatest sensitivity to horizontal vibration around 2 Hz,suggesting that the increased discomfort around these frequencies was associated with resonance of the body.…”
Section: Fig 8 About Heresupporting
confidence: 48%
“…kr and cr), indicating that the first peak in the fore-andaft apparent mass is produced by a rotational vibration mode (Figures 9 and 10). This is consistent with previous studies, which reported that the first peak in the fore-and-aft apparent mass is produced by sway of the body when exposed to fore-and-aft vibration while sitting without a backrest [10,24]. This behaviour can be explained easily if one visualises the upper body on the seat as an inverted pendulum on a cart.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysissupporting
confidence: 92%
“…the body) undergoes a sway motion. When a backrest was used, it provided a support for the body and the sway motion disappeared, as reported in [11,24]. The high variability in the parameters of the rotational degrees-of-freedom, kr and cr (Tables 1 and 2), could be attributed to the differences in the masses and dimensions of the subjects.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation