The appetizing effect of an apéritif in overweight and normal-weight humans

Westerterp-Plantenga, Margriet S.; Verwegen, Christianne R.T

doi:10.1093/ajcn/69.2.205

Cited by 133 publications

(93 citation statements)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This was in contrast to a partial compensation (about 30%) when isoenergetic and isovolumetric liquid appetizers containing carbohydrate, fat or protein were given. 6 The higher intake of lunch after alcohol was a result of both an increased eating rate and eating time. No compensation occurred for the increased intake with alcohol compared to the non-alcoholic appetizers during the rest of the day, according to subjects' own food intake diaries.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of wine or beer versus a carbonated soft drink, served at a meal, on ad libitum energy intake

Buemann¹,

Toubro²,

Astrup³

2002

Int J Obes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND: Alcoholic beverage drinking may increase total energy intake at a meal by various mechanisms and this effect may depend on the sort of beverage. OBJECTIVE: To test the effect of wine, beer and a soft drink served with a normal meal on food and total energy intake in nonobese men. DESIGN: A supper meal consisting of three consecutive dishes was presented to 22 young men. Ad libitum energy intakes (EI) of the meal were measured at three different occasions in a cross-over design with red wine, lager beer or a carbonated soft drink. This was done in two studies with different design. In the first study the beverages were supplied ad libitum and in a second study the intake of the beverages was fixed: beer and soft drink at 9 ml=kg body weight and wine isoalcoholic to beer, 3.185 ml=kg body weight. RESULTS: In the ad libitum beverage study total EI was higher with wine than with the soft drink and beer (P < 0.05). In the fixed beverage study differences in total EI did not reach statistical significance (P ¼ 0.14), although the intake of goulash was higher with wine and beer than with the soft drink (P < 0.005). CONCLUSION: These data indicate that alcoholic beverages, and wine in particular, may enhance total EI at a meal relative to a soft drink, when served with no restriction.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of wine or beer versus a carbonated soft drink, served at a meal, on ad libitum energy intake

Buemann¹,

Toubro²,

Astrup³

2002

Int J Obes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Moderate alcohol consumption increases dietary uptake, the 24-h energy intake being higher on days when an aperitif is taken 33 . However ethanol can cause satiety because it delays gastric emptying 21 .…”

Section: How the Body Deals With Ethanolmentioning

confidence: 99%

Beer, Carbohydrates and Diet

Bamforth

2005

Journal of the Institute of Brewing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The enormous incidence of excess body weight in the population of the United States and the attendant risks that obesity brings has stimulated unprecedented interest in diets, especially those that do not leave an individual feeling hungry. In particular this has led to so‐called ‘low carb’ diets. Beer has suffered unfairly through erroneous claims made in connection with at least one of these diets and has been unfairly categorised as being “high carb”. In the face of this — and despite the fact that the vast majority of beers contain low levels of so‐called “carbs” — there have been certain brands specifically branded as low carb products. Brewers intent on marketing products that may genuinely be considered to be part of a “calorie counting” diet should focus on developing products of excellence that contain low levels of alcohol, the latter molecule being the major source of calories in most beers. They may also do more to press the claim of beer as being a source of “good carbs”, for the soluble fibre and prebiotic molecules that it contains and which are derived from the β‐linked glucans and arabinoxylans that derive from the cereal cell walls.

show abstract

“…Subjects had to be unrestrained eaters. The degree of dietary restraint was determined by the three-factor eating questionnaire (TFEQ, score Factor 1, ie cognitive restraint r9) 21,22 and by the Herman/Polivy restraint questionnaire (HP, score r15). 23 Height was measured using a wall-mounted stadiometer (Seca, model 220, Hamburg, Germany).…”

Section: Subjectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of conjugated linoleic acid supplementation after weight loss on body weight regain, body composition, and resting metabolic rate in overweight subjects

et al. 2003

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVE:To study the effects of 13 weeks conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) supplementation in overweight subjects after weight loss on weight regain, body composition, resting metabolic rate, substrate oxidation, and blood plasma parameters. DESIGN: This study had a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized design. Subjects were first submitted to a very-lowcalorie diet (VLCD 2.1 MJ/d) for 3 weeks after which they started with the 13-week intervention period. They either received 1.8 g CLA or placebo per day (low dosage, LD) or 3.6 g CLA or placebo per day (high dosage, HD). SUBJECTS: A total of 26 men and 28 women (age 37.877.7 y; body mass index (BMI) 27.871.5 kg/m 2 ). MEASUREMENTS: Before VLCD (t ¼ À3), after VLCD but before CLA or placebo intervention (t ¼ 0) and after 13-week CLA or placebo intervention (t ¼ 13), body weight, body composition (hydrodensitometry and deuterium dilution), resting metabolic rate, substrate oxidation, physical activity, and blood plasma parameters (glucose, insulin, triacylglycerol, free fatty acids, glycerol and b-hydroxy butyrate) were measured. RESULTS: The VLCD significantly lowered body weight (6.971.7%), %body fat, fat mass, fat-free mass, resting metabolic rate, respiratory quotient and plasma glucose, insulin, and triacylglycerol concentrations, while free fatty acids, glycerol and b-hydroxy butyrate concentrations were increased. Multiple regression analysis showed that at the end of the 13-week intervention, CLA did not affect %body weight regain (CLA LD 47.9788.2%, CLA HD 27.4729.8%, Placebo LD 32.0742.8%, Placebo HD 22.5737.9%). The regain of fat-free mass was increased by CLA (LD 6.273.9, HD 4.672.4%) compared to placebo (LD 2.873.2%, HD 3.473.6%), independent of %body weight regain and physical activity. As a consequence of an increased regain of fat-free mass by CLA, resting metabolic rate was increased by CLA (LD 12.0711.4%, HD 13.7714.4%) compared to placebo (LD 9.1711.0%, HD 8.678.5%). Substrate oxidation and blood plasma parameters were not affected by CLA. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the regain of fat-free mass was favorably, dose-independently affected by a 13-week consumption of 1.8 or 3.6 g CLA/day and consequently increased the resting metabolic rate. However, it did not result in improved body weight maintenance after weight loss.

show abstract

The appetizing effect of an apéritif in overweight and normal-weight humans

Cited by 133 publications

References 48 publications

The effect of wine or beer versus a carbonated soft drink, served at a meal, on ad libitum energy intake

The effect of wine or beer versus a carbonated soft drink, served at a meal, on ad libitum energy intake

Beer, Carbohydrates and Diet

The effect of conjugated linoleic acid supplementation after weight loss on body weight regain, body composition, and resting metabolic rate in overweight subjects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About