2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2018.04.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Applicability of CAT tools in industry – boundaries and challenges in tolerance engineering practice observed in a medical device company

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the introduction of the personal computer 30 years ago, the development of software tools for tolerance analysis increased in importance [27]. A large number of software tools [28][29][30] were developed [31][32][33][34], which have since established themselves in few companies worldwide [35,36]. Due to the variety of methods and tools developed, there was an increasing need to revise existing standards.…”
Section: What Led Us To Today?-a Brief Historical Review On Tolerance Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the introduction of the personal computer 30 years ago, the development of software tools for tolerance analysis increased in importance [27]. A large number of software tools [28][29][30] were developed [31][32][33][34], which have since established themselves in few companies worldwide [35,36]. Due to the variety of methods and tools developed, there was an increasing need to revise existing standards.…”
Section: What Led Us To Today?-a Brief Historical Review On Tolerance Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus of [35] was on the application of tolerance analysis in the field of medical engineering. They discuss the use and challenges of using software tools for tolerance analysis (computer-aided tolerancing, or CAT) in a company.…”
Section: Surveys On Tolerance Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In moving, multiple-state mechanical products (i.e., products where the engagement of interfaces, and thus of parts, continuously change during use, thus having multiple structural states (Andreasen, Hansen & Cash 2015) that are the specific configurations of interfaces between parts see definition later), it has been observed that it is difficult for the product development teams to create an overview of the behavior of the products. As a result, it is difficult for the design practitioners to identify the interfaces that are critical for the intended behavior and thus for the intended functions across the different structural states (Bjarklev, Mortensen & Ebro 2017;Sigurdarson, Eifler & Ebro 2018). There is simply a lack of a systematic and quantitative approach or tool for prioritizing the tolerance analysis tasks.…”
Section: Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available commercial CAT tools were reviewed by Prisco & Giorleo (2002) and later by Sigurdarson et al (2018). Both contributions describe that CAT systems in many cases are capable of doing advanced tolerance calculations.…”
Section: Modeling Variation In Mechanical Assembliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation