2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The applicability of marginal abatement cost approach: A comprehensive review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
62
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As applied here, MAC curves are used to assess the economic trade-offs required for a nation to reach a specific level of GHG emission. They contribute to understanding the complex balance between mitigating climate change and economic development and to putting priorities on mitigation options (Huang et al, 2016). They are not without limitations, however, and this requires caution in interpreting their results when they are used to inform decision-making.…”
Section: Limitations Of Mac Curves For Decision Making Regarding Mitimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As applied here, MAC curves are used to assess the economic trade-offs required for a nation to reach a specific level of GHG emission. They contribute to understanding the complex balance between mitigating climate change and economic development and to putting priorities on mitigation options (Huang et al, 2016). They are not without limitations, however, and this requires caution in interpreting their results when they are used to inform decision-making.…”
Section: Limitations Of Mac Curves For Decision Making Regarding Mitimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supply curves based on the individual assessment of abatement measures suffer from additional shortcomings such as not considering interactions, non-economic costs, and behavioral changes, as well as incorrect counting of benefits, and inconsistent baselines [66]. It has been suggested that supply curves be used more for comparisons of alternatives than for quantifying cumulative progress to abatement [67]. The ability of supply curves to predict future abatement has been critiqued because of the lack of considerations of longer-term changes in markets driven by consumer changes, the timing of policy actions, actions taken by other actors in the market, and changes in future technologies [68].…”
Section: Summary and Critiques Of Supply Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CO 2 shadow price can be defined as the opportunity cost of output loss when an additional unit of CO 2 is reduced under a certain technology [4], as estimated with the micro production efficiency model. Given the detailed technology and economic constraints, this type of model defines a set of production possibilities, then reduces CO 2 emissions and captures the opportunity costs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%