2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2010.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The applicability of urinary creatinine as a method of specimen normalization in the cystic fibrosis population

Abstract: Background Urine specimens are commonly used in biomarker research. Urinary creatinine (UCr) is often used to adjust for urine analyte concentration. We aim to explore the applicability of UCr as a normalization method in a cystic fibrosis (CF) population during hospitalization. Methods Multiple spot urine samples were collected from CF patients hospitalized for a pulmonary exacerbation. Single spot specimens were obtained from asthmatics and healthy children for comparison. The assumptions and implications … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, no other markers of urine dilutions were available in the NHANES III and NHANES 1999–2006 datasets, and we were unable to evaluate our results against those where urine dilutions were adjusted using alternative means. Nevertheless, our unusual findings regarding creatinine adjustments in NHANES III has added to the growing number of studies questioning the practice of urinary creatinine adjustment (Wagner et al, 2010; Weaver et al, 2011, 2014). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Unfortunately, no other markers of urine dilutions were available in the NHANES III and NHANES 1999–2006 datasets, and we were unable to evaluate our results against those where urine dilutions were adjusted using alternative means. Nevertheless, our unusual findings regarding creatinine adjustments in NHANES III has added to the growing number of studies questioning the practice of urinary creatinine adjustment (Wagner et al, 2010; Weaver et al, 2011, 2014). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…One interesting possibility is to use the level of other biomolecules in body fluids such as creatinine levels in blood and urine to normalize miRNAs. The levels of creatinine have been used to “normalize” other biomolecules in urine, and it provides an interesting possibility as a normalization basis for miRNAs in plasma and urine [70,71]. …”
Section: Issues Associated With Mirna Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underlying assumption to this approach is that the UCr excretion rate is constant within an individual over time and also across individuals, which may not be the case, especially in a sick CF population receiving nephrotoxic IV medications,25, 27, 29 We chose to report both unadjusted and a novel, SG‐adjusted UDes concentration given our finding that UCr concentration significantly decreased during hospitalization, making the use of a UCr normalization ratio inappropriate in this population 27. Knowing that a method of normalization is imperative to urinary biomarker measurements, we chose to normalize UDes concentration using a regression model incorporating SG as a covariate, as opposed to using a simple ratio with UCr 27, 28. Our finding of a significant decrease in UDes held true in the analysis of both unadjusted UDes concentration and UDes concentration incorporating SG as a normalization factor into a statistical model 27.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowing that a method of normalization is imperative to urinary biomarker measurements, we chose to normalize UDes concentration using a regression model incorporating SG as a covariate, as opposed to using a simple ratio with UCr 27, 28. Our finding of a significant decrease in UDes held true in the analysis of both unadjusted UDes concentration and UDes concentration incorporating SG as a normalization factor into a statistical model 27. SG has been previously utilized as a normalization factor for urinary biomarker measurement and may be a more appropriate measure of urinary concentration in the CF population during exacerbation 46…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation