1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-4332(97)00225-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The application of a low energy loss electron detector in conjunction with scanning Auger microscopy: an aid to quantitative surface microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These linescans clearly show the oxygen enhancement at the Si/Ti interface, which has a mean atomic number of 20 revealed by the loss linescan. 15 The TiN region shows up in the loss linescan with a mean atomic number of 18. Finally, new features associated with the regions of lower brightness at the contact centres can be seen on the right-hand side of the loss linescan.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These linescans clearly show the oxygen enhancement at the Si/Ti interface, which has a mean atomic number of 20 revealed by the loss linescan. 15 The TiN region shows up in the loss linescan with a mean atomic number of 18. Finally, new features associated with the regions of lower brightness at the contact centres can be seen on the right-hand side of the loss linescan.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(The carbon KLL Auger peak also was considerably reduced.) The loss electron signals (Barkshire et al 1997, Wells 1972 (measured so as to include all electrons having lost < 200 eV in the sample) were recorded in addition to the O(KLL) and Si(LVV) signals during linescanning perpendicular to the stripe.…”
Section: Sio 2 Stripe Embedded In Simentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment of sample contamination effects is often complicated by the fact that LLE detectors employed in high-vacuum FEGSEMs often differ in design from the corresponding detector used in ultra-high-vacuum (UHV) instruments. To reduce complications arising from dissimilar detector characteristics, the present work employed the same LLE detector employed in the earlier study that took place under UHV conditions (Barkshire et al, 1997; Pratt et al, 2007). Using this detector, LLE data were acquired from the pure elemental standards previously used, and additionally the experimental LLE spectra were matched to the results of Monte Carlo simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%