1998
DOI: 10.1519/00124278-199802000-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Application of an Exercise and Wellness Program for Cancer Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed a significant increase of 61.8% in leg presses and 67.1% in chest presses. Possible explanations for the observed differences compared with the Durak and Lilly (1998) study can be that the cancer patients had finished chemotherapy before the program and that a different method was used to measure muscle strength. A comparative analysis of the three studies shows that the patients' muscle strength at baseline (test 1) is higher in the current study (legpress 100.08 kg) than in those by Durak and Lilly (1998) (legpress 23.5 kg) and Kolden et al (2002) (legpress 73.65 kg).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results showed a significant increase of 61.8% in leg presses and 67.1% in chest presses. Possible explanations for the observed differences compared with the Durak and Lilly (1998) study can be that the cancer patients had finished chemotherapy before the program and that a different method was used to measure muscle strength. A comparative analysis of the three studies shows that the patients' muscle strength at baseline (test 1) is higher in the current study (legpress 100.08 kg) than in those by Durak and Lilly (1998) (legpress 23.5 kg) and Kolden et al (2002) (legpress 73.65 kg).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Another training form was home‐based moderate walking exercise programs of at least 90 min/week (Mock et al, 1994; Schwartz, 1999; Segal et al, 2001). Few of these studies attempt to involve cancer patients with varying diagnoses and undergoing chemotherapy, and only a small number of exercise interventions involved patients with hematological malignancies (Durak & Lilly, 1998; Dimeo et al, 1999, 2003). The literature (MacVicar et al, 1989; Segal et al, 2001–2003; Kolden et al, 2002) shows only a few attempts to measure the effects of exercise by means of objective physiological methods in cancer patients concurrently undergoing treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In an attempt to overcome these limitations, and to adhere to the scientific demands of documenting specific effects, exercise interventions have become more structured and include more specific objective physiological measurements such as maximum oxygen uptake (VO 2max ) (MacVicar et al, 1989) and one‐repetition maximum (1RM) tests (Durak & Lilly, 1998; Kolden et al, 2002; Adamsen et al, 2003). Lucia et al (2003) argue that pre‐training testing for functional capacity is crucial in developing personalized training programs for individual cancer patients, and moreover, that regular testing should occur throughout the course of an exercise intervention in order to determine consistent improvement in a patient's functional capacity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%