1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00189710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The application of an in-line, stereoscopic, PIV system to 3-component velocity measurements

Abstract: The paper describes an in-line viewing system for use in stereo vision and its practical implementation in 3-component, PIV studies in a wind tunnel. The transformation equations, relating image co-ordinates to object position, are developed and the significance of view matching and quantisation in error propagation are discussed and the resulting errors estimated. Directional ambiguity is resolved by pulse intensity coding and the use of an intensity sensitive image tracking algorithm.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To address this issue, efforts have been made to extend the spatial range of measurement of PIV to the third spatial dimension. Ingenious set-ups have been implemented to extract the so-called out-of-plane component from combined planar views of the flow field: angular (Gauthier and Riethmuller 1988), translational (Prasad and Adrian 1993), single camera setup (Reese et al 1995), Scheimpflug arrangement (Prasad and Jensen 1995), in-line (Grant et al 1995), multilayer (Raffel et al 1996, Abe et al 1998, scanning (Brücker 1997), multiplane (Kähler and Kompenhans 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this issue, efforts have been made to extend the spatial range of measurement of PIV to the third spatial dimension. Ingenious set-ups have been implemented to extract the so-called out-of-plane component from combined planar views of the flow field: angular (Gauthier and Riethmuller 1988), translational (Prasad and Adrian 1993), single camera setup (Reese et al 1995), Scheimpflug arrangement (Prasad and Jensen 1995), in-line (Grant et al 1995), multilayer (Raffel et al 1996, Abe et al 1998, scanning (Brücker 1997), multiplane (Kähler and Kompenhans 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most approaches may be classified as stereographic (Chang et al 1984), holographic (Thompson 1989) or multiple plane (light sheet) in methodology (Utami and Ueno 1984) with some studies combining the techniques (Grant et al 1991). Variants of the stereogrammetry method making the method more robust and simple to apply (Grant and Pan 1995) have been reported.…”
Section: Particle Image Velocimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) In a first experimental application, a vortex generator was used to produce a wing-tip type vortex A Nd:YAG laser illuminated a plane normal to the mean flow. The images, captured on 35 mm film, were processed using the multi-layer, feed-forwards neural method (Grant and Pan 1995). The image pairs were found to be correctly matched on 91.7% of occasions ( figure 9(a)).…”
Section: A Case Study: Multi-layer Feed-forwards Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, particle image velocimetry (PIV) (Adrian 1991;Willert and Gharib 1991) is an effective technique due to its capability of measuring 2-D flow fields instantaneously, which can produce statistics of the mean velocity field, Reynolds stresses, turbulent kinetic energy (TKE), dissipation rate, etc. PIV can also measure distribution of 3 velocity components with stereoscopic or holographic imaging techniques (Arroyo and Greated 1991;Prasad and Adrian 1993;Grant et al 1995;Zhang et al 1997). However, PIV systems are generally not suitable for field experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%