1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-555x(99)00003-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The application of computational fluid dynamics to natural river channels: three-dimensional versus two-dimensional approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
208
1
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(222 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
10
208
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[5] While there are significant concerns over turbulence parameterization in these near wall treatments, research has demonstrated that, in natural river channels with gravelly beds, much greater uncertainty is introduced into predictions of the three-dimensional velocity field due to poor knowledge and treatment of topographic variability than is introduced by uncertainty over turbulence treatments at the wall [Lane et al, 1999]. The basic principle adopted for representing topographic variability involves the multiplication upward of the equivalent sand grain roughness (k s ) in equation (2b).…”
Section: Background To Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] While there are significant concerns over turbulence parameterization in these near wall treatments, research has demonstrated that, in natural river channels with gravelly beds, much greater uncertainty is introduced into predictions of the three-dimensional velocity field due to poor knowledge and treatment of topographic variability than is introduced by uncertainty over turbulence treatments at the wall [Lane et al, 1999]. The basic principle adopted for representing topographic variability involves the multiplication upward of the equivalent sand grain roughness (k s ) in equation (2b).…”
Section: Background To Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most sediment transport models used to simulate braided rivers are depth-averaged models because three-dimensional (3D) morphodynamics modeling tends to be computationally expensive and 3D calibration data are often unavailable (Lane et al, 1999). However, braided river flows are strongly affected by 3D effects and bedload transport tend not to be handled effectively using averaged cross-sectional or channel properties data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because, in urban areas, buildings behave as obstacles, leading to hydrodynamic forces like stagnation pressure, lateral shear and flow separation [23]. Lane et.al [24] found that 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models provide more reliable estimates of bed shear stress. They provide more information of the 3D flow structures, and better representation of the flow process than 2D models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%