2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10916-019-1414-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Application of Deep Learning in the Risk Grading of Skin Tumors for Patients Using Clinical Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible solution is to use a rather lightweight CNN such as Xception, which is an adaptation from the Inception architecture, where the Inception modules have been replaced with depthwise separable convolutions [ 32 , 33 ]. The Xception architecture outperformed the InceptionV3 network on the ImageNet dataset and was previously used to successfully classify clinical images of skin pathologies and computed tomography images [ 34 , 35 ]. Therefore, this network architecture seemed most appropriate for our purpose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible solution is to use a rather lightweight CNN such as Xception, which is an adaptation from the Inception architecture, where the Inception modules have been replaced with depthwise separable convolutions [ 32 , 33 ]. The Xception architecture outperformed the InceptionV3 network on the ImageNet dataset and was previously used to successfully classify clinical images of skin pathologies and computed tomography images [ 34 , 35 ]. Therefore, this network architecture seemed most appropriate for our purpose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the third phase, the proposal was compared to the following state-of-the-art CNN models that have previously been used in melanoma diagnosis: InceptionV3 [3], DenseNet [25], VGG16 [10], MobileNet [24], Xception [26] and NASNetMobile [72,73]. Table 2 shows the configuration used to train all the models: the learning rate ðaÞ was equal to 0.01 and it was reduced by a factor of 0.2 if an improvement in predictive performance was not observed during 10 epochs; the weights of the networks were initialized using Xavier method [74] in those cases where transfer learning was not present, e.g., the prediction block and baseline CNN models; a batch of size 8 was used due the medium size of the used datasets and the models were trained along 150 epochs.…”
Section: Experimental Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the suitability of this proposal, an extensive experimental study was conducted on sixteen melanoma-image datasets, enabling a better analysis of the effectiveness of the model. The results showed that the proposed approach achieved promising results and was competitive compared to six state-of-the-art CNN models which have previously been used for diagnosing melanoma [3,10,[24][25][26]. These works were summarized in Pe ´rez et al [8], and the most relevant are explained in the next section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep learning, especially CNNs, and its medical applications have made great progress in recent years. [8][9][10] In the field of computer-aided diagnosis for skin diseases, especially for tumours, [11][12][13][14][15] the monumental breakthroughs have been made in Ref., 16 where CNN surpassed senior dermatologists on both classification tasks (keratinocytes cancer vs. benign seborrhoeic keratosis and malignant melanoma vs. benign moles). Han et al 17 proposed to use the ResNet-152 model on clinical images to classify benign and malignant cutaneous tumours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%