1991
DOI: 10.1002/apmc.1991.051890117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The application of DSC in identification of LDPE/LLDPE blends mulching film

Abstract: The mulching film samples of known and unknown composition LDPE/LLDPE blends have been analysed and the film samples of unknown composition have been identified by means of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The relationships between composition of film samples and melting enthalpy peak in their DSC thermograms have been discussed. The working curve for determining the composition has been given. The experimental results show that DSC is a quick, effective and accurate method for the analysis of main com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be due to PCL and CS‐g‐PCL differing in their ability to crystallize and resulting crystal size. PCL as a linear polymer chain should be able to crystallize easily at higher temperatures and form crystallites with a high lamellae thickness in contrast to the branched and relatively poor ordered CS‐g‐PCL; this probably resulted in the observed double melting peaks on DSC thermograms . The second lowered melting peak can be explained, even without any effects of reorganizational or matrix effects, with the increase of components hardly crystallizing in the actual blend, which result in a lower overall intermolecular interaction …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be due to PCL and CS‐g‐PCL differing in their ability to crystallize and resulting crystal size. PCL as a linear polymer chain should be able to crystallize easily at higher temperatures and form crystallites with a high lamellae thickness in contrast to the branched and relatively poor ordered CS‐g‐PCL; this probably resulted in the observed double melting peaks on DSC thermograms . The second lowered melting peak can be explained, even without any effects of reorganizational or matrix effects, with the increase of components hardly crystallizing in the actual blend, which result in a lower overall intermolecular interaction …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exothermic peaks (labelled as Tc1, Tc2, and Tc3 in Figure 2b) describe crystallization events. In this case, the correspondence with polymer species is less clear, but the lower temperature events, i.e., Tc2 and Tc3, can be ascribed to LDPE [18], which is characterized by a broad melting range and low peak shape as a result of long branches and wider molecular weight distribution [20]. The sharper peak Tc1 represents the crystallization of HDPE overlapped with that of the PP impurity, whose crystallization occurs in the temperature range ~110-115 °C [18,19,21,22].…”
Section: Thermal Characterization Of Compositesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Three peaks can be recognized also in the cooling curves ( Figure 2 b). While those labelled as T c2 and T c3 are due to the crystallization of LDPE with its characteristic broad melting range and low peak shape related to long branches and wide molecular weight distribution [ 29 , 31 ], T c1 is instead likely due to HDPE with the crystallization of PP overlapped, which occurs in the range 110–115 °C [ 32 , 33 ]. Flax fibres did not significantly affect the crystallization and melting temperatures, though these temperatures were higher compared to those found in basalt-EcoAllene composites, suggesting an easier crystallization and a more stable crystalline morphology, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%