The Application of Environmental Governance Networks in Small Island Destinations: Evidence from Indonesia and the Coral Triangle

Charlie, Charlie; King, Brian; Pearlman, Michael

doi:10.1080/21568316.2012.730056

Cited by 17 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While the action-oriented network is voluntary and self-regulating, the policy and planning network is rather mandatory and regulatory [5]. In an action-oriented network, 'shared motivation' needs to be generated before 'capacity for joint action' can be achieved.…”

Section: Collaboration Dynamicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The collaborative governance setting in Nusa Penida MPA is identified by Charlie et al [5] as a policy and planning network. Collaboration was initiated by the CTC and the objective is to implement and enforce the management plan jointly with all user groups [5].…”

Section: Collaboration Dynamicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…According to Charlie et al [5] there are two types of collaborative governance networks: First, action-oriented networks where the initiative comes from private institutions or the community who engage with the objective to yield collaborative action for tackling problems; second, policy and planning networks where public institutions or the government initiate collaboration by coordinating relationships with other stakeholders such as NGOs, business owners and local communities with the objective to develop and implement action plans. While the action-oriented network is voluntary and self-regulating, the policy and planning network is rather mandatory and regulatory [5].…”

Section: Collaboration Dynamicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The initiative to establish the MPA was taken by The Nature Conservancy, an international NGO, together with the district government of Klungkung, province of Bali, and gave rise to the Coral Triangle Center (CTC) (Charlie, 2013). Nusa Penida MPA falls under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries and is governed in a collaborative approach by the CTC and multiple local departments [28].…”

Section: Nusa Penida Mpamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In Indonesia, a country in the Coral Triangle -a region representing the global center of marine biodiversity containing 30% of the world's coral reefs -a framework of collaborative governance was applied in development and implementation of the Nusa Penida MPA [5,25]. Established in 2010, and officially declared in 2014, the Nusa Penida MPA protects 20,057 ha of diverse marine ecosystem, including rare species like ocean sunfish and manta rays [25,28].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Action and inertia in collaborative governance

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Collaboration Dynamicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Collaboration Dynamicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Collaboration Dynamicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Nusa Penida Mpamentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Action and inertia in collaborative governance

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social capital and community disaster resilience: post-earthquake tourism recovery on Gili Trawangan, Indonesia

Partelow

2020

Sustain Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study examines the hypothesis that social capital can be a foundation for community disaster resilience with an analysis of empirical findings from the August 2018 earthquake recovery on Gili Trawangan, Indonesia, a globally known coastal tourism destination. Positive links between community social capital and community disaster resilience are hypothesized, but the extent to which an iterative and interdependent relationship is co-shaping both is less understood. Social capital can enable collective action, providing self-organized social, psychological, financial and material resources following a disaster, that may otherwise need to be provided externally. In turn, disasters create collective action problems where collective response and recovery process are needed, creating an institutional space where the degree of usefulness, meaning and function of social capital can be shaped, recognized and drawn upon, often where external aid is insufficient. These relationships can be observed following disasters, because individuals and communities are often linked through emotive and meaningful sequences of common experiences, actions and activities. Findings descriptively detail Gili Trawangan’s response and recovery process through the events and activities that occurred, and are then theoretically analyzed with a social capital framework including bonding (within group), bridging (between group) and linking (across power and institutional) ties. Three conclusions can be summarized. (1) Community social capital and disaster resilience are iteratively co-shaped through collective experiences, actions and activities. (2) Understanding context is critical for understanding if and to what degree this relationship exists. (3) The mechanism through which social capital enhances resilience is that it can enable collective action that can lead to the provision of needed aid and services. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s11625-020-00854-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

Commoning the governance: a review of literature and the integration of power

Partelow

Manlosa

2022

Sustain Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The concept of commoning is continuing to gain scholarly interest, with multiple definitions and interpretations across different research communities. In this article, we define commoning as the actions by groups with shared interests towards creating shared social and relational processes as the basis of governance strategy. Perhaps it can be more simply defined as collective ways of relating and governing. This article addresses two specific gaps in the commoning literature: (1) to bridge disparate strands of literature on commoning by briefly reviewing each and arguing for integration through epistemic pluralism, and (2) to explicitly examine how power is manifest in commoning processes by bringing in a framework on power (i.e., power over, power with, power to, power within) to understand the links between power and commoning governance processes in two case studies. The two cases are tourism governance on Gili Trawangan, Indonesia and aquatic food production systems in Bulacan, Philippines. We preface this analysis with the argument that power is an integral part of the commoning concept, but that it has yet to be analytically integrated to applications of the broader institutional analysis and development framework or within the networks of action situations approach. We argue that by making explicit how an analysis of power can be coupled to a network of action situations analysis in a qualitative way, we are advancing a key feature of the commoning concept, which we introduce as rooted in epistemic and analytical pluralism in the analysis of governance. In the discussion, we expand on how each case study reveals each of the four power dynamics, and how they improve the understanding of commoning as a pluralistic and perhaps bridging analytical concept.

show abstract

The Application of Environmental Governance Networks in Small Island Destinations: Evidence from Indonesia and the Coral Triangle

Cited by 17 publications

References 33 publications

Action and inertia in collaborative governance

Action and inertia in collaborative governance

Social capital and community disaster resilience: post-earthquake tourism recovery on Gili Trawangan, Indonesia

Commoning the governance: a review of literature and the integration of power

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About