2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0290(19960320)49:6<601::aid-bit1>3.0.co;2-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The application of membrane biological reactors for the treatment of wastewaters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
108
1
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 287 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
108
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The stability and performance of biological treatment processes is intimately related to biomass retention, and membrane bioreactors (MBRs) have been used for this purpose to physically retain microorganisms inside the reactor to produce solids free and better quality effluents [1,2]. Despite good COD removals and high loading rates, MBR systems often suffer from flux decline due to membrane fouling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stability and performance of biological treatment processes is intimately related to biomass retention, and membrane bioreactors (MBRs) have been used for this purpose to physically retain microorganisms inside the reactor to produce solids free and better quality effluents [1,2]. Despite good COD removals and high loading rates, MBR systems often suffer from flux decline due to membrane fouling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bubbleless aeration prevented the possible problem of stripping-loss of acetonitrile in the conventional practices of using bubbled aeration (31) or mechanically stirred aeration (9). The oxygen conversion rate with the bubbleless oxygen supply in the MABR may also approach 100% due to the complete utilization of the oxygen in the biofilm (12). This is in contrast with the oxygen conversion efficiency of 5-25% in the conventionally aerated systems (32).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 it was also noted that the NH 4 + -N removal efficiency decreased along with the increasing of volumetric loading rate and sludge loading rate, accordingly to the results of [20][21][22]. However, a marked difference was noted that from 58.66% (C/N ratio = 17) to 65.79% (C/N ratio = 9.25) of NH 4 + -N removal efficiency could be achieved in the first stage despite the volumetric rate loading and sludge rate loading was high, especially under high influent flow distribution ratios condition, which were opposite to the results of [23][24][25]. However, these were attributed to the presence of simultaneous nitrification and denitrification.…”
Section: The Effect Of Influent Flow Distribution On the Biological Nmentioning
confidence: 99%