The application of outcrop analogues in geological modelling: a review, present status and future outlook

Abstract

Analogues, especially outcrop analogues, have played a central role in improving understanding of subsurface reservoir architectures. Analogues provide important information on geobody size, geometry and potential connectivity. The historical application of outcrop analogues for understanding geobody distributions in reservoirs is reviewed, from the pioneering work of the 1960s to the high-tech virtual outcrop methodologies of today. Four key types of analogue data are identified: hard data, which describe the dimensions and geometry of the geobody; soft data, which describe the conceptual relationships between different geobody types; training images, which record the dimensions, proportions and spatial relationship; and analogue production data, which are taken from direct subsurface production analogues. The use of these different data types at different stages of the geomodelling workflow is discussed and the potential sources of error considered. Finally, a review of geobody and analogue studies in different clastic environments is discussed with reference to selected previous work and the range of papers in the current volume.Over the last 30 years, computer-based, geocellular models have become a routinely used tool for understanding subsurface reservoirs (Budding & Inglin 1981; review in Keogh et al. 2007). Such models are typically built to aid field development and reservoir management business decisions, but also serve the purpose of integrating disparate scales and types of subsurface data, and visualizing complex three-dimensional (3D) distributions of rocks and fluids. Since the application of early modelling tools, to the present day, it has been common practice to supplement sparse subsurface datasets (e.g. wells and seismic) with data and concepts derived from reservoir analogues. The intention of this process is to generate more accurate representations of the subsurface than would otherwise be possible. Considerable effort has been expended in recent years by industry and academia on the description of reservoir analogues for this purpose. This paper examines the challenges inherent in selection and application of appropriate analogue data, particularly quantitative datasets, during construction of geological models.The most commonly used type of analogue is the outcrop, where information on geometric data that are limited in the subsurface is more readily available in cliff sections. Analogues may also include subsurface data but this is less common. This aspect is considered briefly in this review. The perspective on the application of analogues as discussed here is with regard to sedimentology and stratigraphy applied to hydrocarbon reservoir analysis, and the insights that 3D facies models bring to the distribution of petrophysical properties that control hydrocarbon flow. The discussion is based on clastic systems, but many of the aspects described are equally as applicable to carbonates, although they are not discussed explicitly here. Other branches of subsurface modelling, no...

Direct Image-to-Geometry Registration Using Mobile Sensor Data

“…Textured surface models are used in a widening range of application domains, such a urban planning (Semmo and Döllner, 2015), cultural heritage (Potenziani et al, 2015), archaeology (Van Damme, 2015) and geological outcrop modelling (Howell et al, 2014, Rarity et al, 2014. After a model has been captured, often by means of terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) or photogrammetry, it may be desirable for domain experts to supplement the model with novel images to make initially-hidden features visible, or to add annotations.…”

Palinspastic restoration of an exhumed deepwater system: A workflow to improve paleogeographic reconstructions

“…Any reduction in this ambiguity is desirable. A pragmatic solution is to draw parallels from exhumed basin-fills with analogous depositional and structural architectures (Alexander, 1993) and scales (Howell et al, 2014).…”

Predictability of properties of a fractured geothermal reservoir: the opportunities and limitations of an outcrop analogue study

“…One common approach to reduce the observational gap between well and seismic data is to include outcrop data into the exploration strategy (Chesnaux et al 2009;Howell et al 2014;Philipp et al 2010;Reinecker et al 2015). The advantages of this approach are that, if good outcrops exist, lateral as well as vertical heterogeneities of rock-and fracture system properties can be observed in detail.…”