2016
DOI: 10.1108/ec-10-2015-0287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The application of simultaneous elimination and back-substitution method (SEBSM) in finite element method

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to introduce a new method called simultaneous elimination and back-substitution method (SEBSM) to solve a system of linear equations as a new finite element method (FEM) solver. Design/methodology/approach In this paper, a new technique assembling the global stiffness matrix will be proposed and meanwhile the direct method SEBSM will be applied to solve the equations formed in FEM. Findings The SEBSM solver for FEM with the present assembling technique has distinct adva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Solving Eq. (7) with a coefficient matrix (9) using a direct method such as Gauss elimination method [22] or simultaneous method [23] needs more memory space and computing time since the coefficient matrix (9) is sparse and large scale. Furthermore, the implementations of the Newton method that use a direct method to obtain the Newton direction are not suitable for many large problems because of their cost in terms of computing the first and second partial derivative.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Proposed Iterative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solving Eq. (7) with a coefficient matrix (9) using a direct method such as Gauss elimination method [22] or simultaneous method [23] needs more memory space and computing time since the coefficient matrix (9) is sparse and large scale. Furthermore, the implementations of the Newton method that use a direct method to obtain the Newton direction are not suitable for many large problems because of their cost in terms of computing the first and second partial derivative.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Proposed Iterative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%