2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The application of subjective and objective method in the evaluation of healthy cities: A case study in Central China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To address the limitations of previous studies, this study proposes a hybrid method that consists of max-min normalization, FA&RT, PRA, the FSM, and the DEMATEL. Initially, secondary data normalization enables the transformation of different units into unit-free numbers with a consideration of their positive and negative features for further analysis (Ran et al, 2021). This method is widely applied to integrate different data types for a comprehensive discussion (Wang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To address the limitations of previous studies, this study proposes a hybrid method that consists of max-min normalization, FA&RT, PRA, the FSM, and the DEMATEL. Initially, secondary data normalization enables the transformation of different units into unit-free numbers with a consideration of their positive and negative features for further analysis (Ran et al, 2021). This method is widely applied to integrate different data types for a comprehensive discussion (Wang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These uncertainties are derived from a need to consider the different types of data under these goals that are not able to be addressed by adopting a single method (Tsai et al, 2020;Tseng et al, 2022). Employing a single method for making decisions may cause incoherence between resource investment and performance due to the constraints on human ability, methodological limitations, and overinterpretations (Regehr et al, 2022;Sotoudeh-Anvari, 2022;Zhang et al, 2022). Several studies have also discovered the complex interrelationships among these goals, which increase the uncertainties for decision/policy makers (Biglari et al, 2022;Bleischwitz et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree of dispersion and the importance of analysis of each evaluation index can be judged by the entropy value and the weight of the index [51,52]. Generally, the smaller the entropy value, the greater the variation degree of the index value, the greater the weight coefficient, the more information provided, the greater the role played in the comprehensive evaluation, and vice versa [52,53]. The rationality of the index weight coefficient directly affects the reliability of the comprehensive evaluation result and even the correctness of the decision.…”
Section: Entropy Value Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether the weight is reasonable and correct will directly affect the reliability of the final evaluation result. Most current methods only consider subjective evaluation (such as analytic hierarchy process [25]) or objective evaluation (such as entropy weight method [26], projection pursuit method [27], etc.). In order to reflect the information contained in the data of the evaluation index and also consider the subjectivity of the experts, this study chooses the algorithm combining an entropy weight method and an analytic hierarchy process to make up for their shortcomings.…”
Section: Determination Of Weightmentioning
confidence: 99%