2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2012.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The application of the formalism of dispersive kinetics for investigation of the isothermal decomposition of zinc leach residue in an inert atmosphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The KJMA exponent, n , is defined to contain contributions from the growth dimensionality, λ, and the nucleation type, β, with limiting cases of 0 for instantaneous nucleation (pre-existing nuclei) and 1 for continuous nucleation. ,, Thus, n = λ + β where 0 ≤ β ≤ 1 and λ = 1, 2, or 3 for 1-, 2-, or 3-D growth, respectively. Given such a specific definition for the KJMA exponent, numerous publications detail reaction mechanisms for crystallization transformations based solely on the KJMA exponent, although many reports caution that kinetic exponents may not reflect the reaction mechanism. ,,, Numerous experimental manuscripts demonstrate variation of the KJMA exponent with isothermal crystallization temperature, , time, ,, heating/cooling rate, , and preannealing temperature. These often are used as evidence that the crystallization mechanism changes over the course of a reaction. While change of mechanism during crystallization is unlikely for congruently melting systems, ,,, such may be possible for noncongruently melting systems where the composition at the crystallization front changes with time. , Consensus has not been reached as to the physical significance of or the consistent conditions under which the KJMA exponent can be correctly interpreted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The KJMA exponent, n , is defined to contain contributions from the growth dimensionality, λ, and the nucleation type, β, with limiting cases of 0 for instantaneous nucleation (pre-existing nuclei) and 1 for continuous nucleation. ,, Thus, n = λ + β where 0 ≤ β ≤ 1 and λ = 1, 2, or 3 for 1-, 2-, or 3-D growth, respectively. Given such a specific definition for the KJMA exponent, numerous publications detail reaction mechanisms for crystallization transformations based solely on the KJMA exponent, although many reports caution that kinetic exponents may not reflect the reaction mechanism. ,,, Numerous experimental manuscripts demonstrate variation of the KJMA exponent with isothermal crystallization temperature, , time, ,, heating/cooling rate, , and preannealing temperature. These often are used as evidence that the crystallization mechanism changes over the course of a reaction. While change of mechanism during crystallization is unlikely for congruently melting systems, ,,, such may be possible for noncongruently melting systems where the composition at the crystallization front changes with time. , Consensus has not been reached as to the physical significance of or the consistent conditions under which the KJMA exponent can be correctly interpreted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The KJMA model is commonly expressed as α ( t ) = 1 exp { false[ k ( t t 0 ) false] n } with rate constant k , nucleation time t 0 , and dimensionality n . These kinetic parameters, particularly the dimensionality, are often used to infer mechanistic detail in spite of the growing body of literature demonstrating that they are empirical, ,− significantly affected by experimental factors, and do not necessarily reflect the true reaction mechanism. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%