The Application of the Socialisation, Externalisation, Combination and Internalisation Model in Cross‐cultural Contexts: Theoretical Analysis

Abstract

This study aims to provide theoretical analysis for the applicability of Nonaka's socialisation, externalisation, combination and internalisation (SECI) model in cross‐cultural contexts. Many Japanese companies are most probably quite successful and a world leader such as Sony, Toyota, Canon, Honda, Hitachi and Olympus. Therefore, proofing the validity of SECI model of creating knowledge in Japanese firms gave the model its great value. The model was produced in 1995 in Japanese context and has been widely quoted in approaches to classifying, creating, documenting, sharing and transferring knowledge from a knowledge management perspective. However, the universal applicability of this model is arguable. It was clear that not all SECI' modes are applicable in the same culture as some of them were widely spread, whereas some were not. Therefore, it is concluded that not all SECI processes reflect traditional Japanese values, but they should be adapted in order to be successfully applied in different contexts. Being aware of culture and its impact on knowledge creation and the application of SECI will enrich the insight of an organisation into their knowledge creation and the processes involved in it. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Enabling Event Volunteer Legacies: A Knowledge Management Perspective

“…It is the process of restructuring existing knowledge that enables it to be exploited. Despite considerable criticism of the model, which argues that it is too individualistic and not empirically sound (see e.g., Gourlay, 2006;Harmaakorpi & Melkas, 2005), its usefulness is reflected in its application across a range of disciplines and contexts including accounting (Cai, 2014), cross-cultural studies (Easa & Fincham, 2012), librarianship (C. S. Lee & Kelkar, 2013), organizational learning (Hong, 2012), and engineering (Sarirete & Chikh, 2010). It has been chosen for this study as its structural focus fits with the KVC approach, while supporting the ideas of the need to move ideas from one place to another to create knowledge, which can then be captured (see also Cook & Brown, 1999).…”

Exploring “culturalization” in rural entrepreneurial context through content analysis

“…Nevertheless, the ladder of interorganizational knowledge creation could be applied to other entrepreneurial contexts. Therefore, further investigations into the impact of context on knowledge creation processes ("culturalization") are needed (Easa & Fincham, 2012;Haag et al, 2010;Hofstede & Hofstede, 2005;Nonaka et al, 2000). ORCID Michela Magliacani http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9108-7978…”

“…The original version of the Nonaka model was formulated in the mid‐90s by exploring Japanese business culture. Some investigations have stressed how SECI processes are strongly affected and shaped by the culture and values that characterize a specific entrepreneurial context (Weir & Hutchings, ; Easa & Fincham, ). The SECI process represented by the knowledge spiral has already been extended beyond organizational boundaries.…”

Effects of Knowledge Development and Culture of Competitiveness on the Performance of Service‐Oriented and Product‐oriented Firms

“…Production, acquisition, movement, retention, and replication of knowledge turned into important topics, as businesses became information repositories and coordinators (Spender, 1996). Knowledge is collected, combined, or edited, and then disseminated in firms (Easa and Fincham, 2012). To the knowledge-based view (of the firm), knowledge is a dynamic capability, involving processes such as knowledge acquisition, sharing, application, and creation (Lichtenthaler and Lichtenthaler, 2009).…”

“…Culture of competitiveness is the ability of a firm to learn, create, and execute actions directed to customer satisfaction, resulting in more effective actions. Easa and Fincham (2012) suggest a "culturisation" factor in the knowledge creation cycle. Hult et al (2007) depict CC as learning, innovativeness, and entrepreneurial orientations.…”