1988
DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1988.9915534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Appreciation of Humor in Captioned Cartoons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
1
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
18
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…So-called aggressive humor would be such a candidate, since aggressive/hostile humor was often postulated to be a relevant humor category. However, other research groups could also not verify such a category, although enough potential representatives were carefully included in the item pool factor analyzed (Herzog and Larwin 1988;Kosuch and Köhler 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So-called aggressive humor would be such a candidate, since aggressive/hostile humor was often postulated to be a relevant humor category. However, other research groups could also not verify such a category, although enough potential representatives were carefully included in the item pool factor analyzed (Herzog and Larwin 1988;Kosuch and Köhler 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cartoons can be classified in relation to formal or structural aspects (i.e., drawing style, resolvability of the incongruity, proportion of visual and verbal elements, etc.). There is evidence from several behavioral studies that formal as well as structural elements of the stimuli influence humor perception and processing (e.g., Herzog & Larwin, 1988;Huber & Leder, 1997;Ruch & Hehl, 1998;Samson & Huber, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karabas (1990) analyzed the e¤ect of hair as one formal element in Turkish cartoons with respect to viewers' attitude toward the persons and situations in the cartoons. Herzog and Larwin (1988) studied humor appreciation for captioned cartoons as a function of cartoon category and eight predictor variables: complexity, di‰culty, fit (how well the caption fits the drawing), depth between the surface meaning and the deeper meaning of the cartoon, visual humor, artwork, vulgarity, and originality. Cartoons judged to have the most originality and the best fit were appreciated most.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%