2015
DOI: 10.1504/ijarge.2015.072903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The approach of Swedish municipalities to the preservation of agricultural land in a planning context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Granvik et al 2015;Jordbruksverket 2013). Interviews and discussions with stakeholders involved at different levels of Swedish public institutions revealed uncertainty within the Swedish bureaucratic system about how to handle the issue of soil preservation, and especially who (in terms of actors or institutions) should bear the main responsibility, including at the national level.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Granvik et al 2015;Jordbruksverket 2013). Interviews and discussions with stakeholders involved at different levels of Swedish public institutions revealed uncertainty within the Swedish bureaucratic system about how to handle the issue of soil preservation, and especially who (in terms of actors or institutions) should bear the main responsibility, including at the national level.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, at the 21 regional levels in Sweden (county administration boards, in Swedish Länsstyrelse), there are usually officials working with the environment and agricultural issues, but not all consider the issue of soil preservation to be important. In Sweden, there are 190 municipalities, whereof most do not have officials working with agriculture, and many of these have been reported as lacking analysis of trade-offs and decision support when deciding to change agricultural land to housing or other constructions (Granvik et al 2015;Jordbruksverket 2013).…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The benefits of implementing local environmental policy will be higher if the population in the municipality is larger, ceteris paribus, because environmental quality is a public good and a greater number of people will derive utility from the environmental improvements achieved. A larger population can also imply greater pressure on water quality and environmental amenities (Granvik et al 2015;COS 2016), implying that the environmental damage is greater, which further strengthens the need for developing local environmental policy. Higher average income is typically associated with a higher willingness-to-pay for environmental improvements (Barbier, Czajkowski, and Hanley 2017).…”
Section: Local Benefits and Costs Of Environmental Policymentioning
confidence: 99%