1994
DOI: 10.2307/1391923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Appropriate Scale Variable in the U.S. Money Demand: An Application of Nonnested Tests of Consumption versus Income Measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…See, for example, Bernanke, Bohn and Reiss (1988) for testing time series investment models and Elyasiani and Nasseh (1994) for testing Mankiw and Summers' (1986) hypothesis about the U.S. money demand function.…”
Section: Nonnested Testing With Serially Correlated Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…See, for example, Bernanke, Bohn and Reiss (1988) for testing time series investment models and Elyasiani and Nasseh (1994) for testing Mankiw and Summers' (1986) hypothesis about the U.S. money demand function.…”
Section: Nonnested Testing With Serially Correlated Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider a simulation experiment based on the empirical example studied in Choi and Kiefer (2008) and Elyasiani and Nasseh (1994). These two papers revisited the hypothesis of Mankiw and Summers (1986) that consumption (or personal expenditure) rather than income (gross national product [GNP]) is the right scale variable for money demand (for M 1 or M 2).…”
Section: Nonnested Testing With Serially Correlated Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…xi Bernanke, Bohn and Reiss (1986) and Elyasiani and Nasseh (1994), among others, use non-nested models to compare some model specifications regarding investment and US money demand, respectively. Elyasiani and Nasseh (2000) xv Note that the sample has been reduced to July 1980 to April 2007 due to 2 missing data for the M4 premiums.…”
Section: A Two-dimensional Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dutkowsky y Atesoglu (2001) ofrecieron una ecuación de demanda de dinero microfundamentada la cual incluye el consumo (en vez del ingreso) como la variable de escala de mejor comportamiento (además, porque es esta la variable pertinente en el proceso de maximización del agente y sobre la cual tiene algún control). En este mismo sentido, Elyasiani y Nasseh (1994), mediante una aplicación de pruebas no anidadas entre un conjunto de variables de escala (ingreso real, ingreso disponible real, gasto en consumo de no durables, gasto privado en consumo y gasto privado total), concluyeron que las medidas de consumo son las variables apropiadas a incluir en la forma funcional de la demanda de M1 en contra de las medidas de gasto total e ingreso.…”
Section: La Pertinencia Del Modelo Previo: Revisión De La Literatura unclassified