2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00025-008-0288-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Approximation of All Continuous Functions on [0, 1] by q-Bernstein Polynomials in the Case q → 1+

Abstract: Since for q > 1, the q-Bernstein polynomials Bn,q(f ; .) are not positive linear operators on C[0, 1], their convergence properties are not similar to those in the case 0 < q ≤ 1. It has been known that, in general, Bn,q n (f ; .) does not approximate f ∈ C[0, 1] if qn → 1 + , n → ∞, unlike in the case qn → 1 − . In this paper, it is shown that if 0 ≤ qn − 1 = o(n −1 3 −n ), n → ∞, then for any f ∈ C[0, 1], we have: Bn,q n (f ; x) → f (x) as n → ∞, uniformly on [0,1].

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, − −1 ( ; ) = 0 = − ( ; ) for ∈ { − −1 , − }, which completes the proof of (20). From (14), (19), and (20), we get…”
Section: Proofs Of Theorems 1-3mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, − −1 ( ; ) = 0 = − ( ; ) for ∈ { − −1 , − }, which completes the proof of (20). From (14), (19), and (20), we get…”
Section: Proofs Of Theorems 1-3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case > 1, , are not positive linear operators on [0, 1], and the lack of positivity makes the investigation of convergence in the case > 1 essentially more difficult. There are many unexpected results concerning convergence of -Bernstein polynomials in the case > 1 (see [2,[12][13][14][15][16][17]). For example, the rate of approximation by -Bernstein polynomials ( > 1) in [0, 1] for functions analytic in { : | | < + } is − versus 1/ for the classical Bernstein polynomials, while, for some infinitely differentiable functions on [0, 1], their sequences of -Bernstein polynomials ( > 1) may be divergent (see [12]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation