1975
DOI: 10.2307/279328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Archaeological Evidence for Manioc Cultivation: A Cautionary Note

Abstract: In the humid tropics of the Americas, where preservation of plant materials is unlikely, archaeological evidence for manioc cultivation largely consists of artifacts which are similar to artifacts associated with manioc cultivation in the ethnographic record and which, by analogy, were similarly used in the prehistoric past. The validity of this inference by analogy is examined in terms of ceramic platters and stone grater teeth, two of the most commonly cited evidences for manioc cultivation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Elsewhere in the Neotropics, starch analyses of proposed grater-board chips have resulted in a similar lack of expected manioc starch (Berman and Pearsall, 2008;Perry, 2004Perry, , 2005. But as these and other researchers (DeBoer, 1975;Dole, 1994) have noted, ethnographic literature shows that graterboards were made from many materials other than stone chips, such as palm spines, animal teeth, shell, and ceramic, as noted above, and they were often used for many things other than manioc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Elsewhere in the Neotropics, starch analyses of proposed grater-board chips have resulted in a similar lack of expected manioc starch (Berman and Pearsall, 2008;Perry, 2004Perry, , 2005. But as these and other researchers (DeBoer, 1975;Dole, 1994) have noted, ethnographic literature shows that graterboards were made from many materials other than stone chips, such as palm spines, animal teeth, shell, and ceramic, as noted above, and they were often used for many things other than manioc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Until recently its dispersal history was poorly known, due mainly to its rarity in macrobotanical and phytolith records. Archaeologists became accustomed to inferring its use from certain artifact types [inferences that probably need to be reevaluated (40,41)]. However, advances in pollen and especially starch grain analyses have markedly increased the direct botanical data available regarding the history of this cultigen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He also highlighted how these were lacking in the much smaller ceramic middens of the Ucayali River. Although cautionary notes [191] and recent starch-grain analyses have cast doubt on the association between these griddles and manioc use [192,193], the widespread use of bitter manioc in eastern Amazonia, the presence of Manihot pollen in Colombian sites with anthropogenic dark earths [38,46], and the fact that bitter manioc processing could well decrease the preservation of Manihot starch grains [see 161], warrants caution with the cautionary note. Insisting that their main use was the processing of bitter manioc, on the other hand, brings to mind suggestions by Reichel-Dolmatoff [194,195], Sanoja [196] and Angulo [197], who long ago argued that model-incised ceramic complexes north of the Amazon basin reflected the cultivation of this crop variety.…”
Section: Anthropogenic Soils and Maniocmentioning
confidence: 99%