2015
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-013838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Archaeology of Ritual

Abstract: The main objective of this review is to consider what archaeology can contribute to general anthropological theories on "ritual in its own right" and to highlight the potential for advancing knowledge about ritual experience as a distinctive material process. An examination of the exceptional material frame marking ceremonial events demonstrates the value of ritual as a heuristic and challenges archaeologists who privilege the interpretation of religion, affect, ontology, or cultural rationalities as necessari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Early sentiment within archaeology held that material evidence considered indicative of ritual behavior required too much inference to be accurate (Hawkes 1954); however, during the past several decades, archaeologists have increasingly studied "ritual" to elucidate many facets of past social activity, especially those pertaining to power relations and identity, along with cognition and social memory (Swenson 2015). Indeed, the recent recognition that ritual is pervasive in all aspects of life has likely facilitated growing interest in this field of study (see Boivin 2009;Hodder 1982;Insoll 2004Insoll , 2009Insoll , 2012.…”
Section: Archaeology Of Ritualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early sentiment within archaeology held that material evidence considered indicative of ritual behavior required too much inference to be accurate (Hawkes 1954); however, during the past several decades, archaeologists have increasingly studied "ritual" to elucidate many facets of past social activity, especially those pertaining to power relations and identity, along with cognition and social memory (Swenson 2015). Indeed, the recent recognition that ritual is pervasive in all aspects of life has likely facilitated growing interest in this field of study (see Boivin 2009;Hodder 1982;Insoll 2004Insoll , 2009Insoll , 2012.…”
Section: Archaeology Of Ritualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ritual is most often associated archaeologically with sacred and mortuary sites; it is often conflated with religious practice, but there also are domestic and secular rituals (Rowan 2011), as well as ritualized regular practice (Hayden 2014;Russell 2015). Theorists who study ritual recognize the problems with the sacred and profane dichotomy and its associated complications (e.g., Rowan 2011;Swenson 2015). Archaeologists who analyze cooking and food preparation are poised to contribute to the discussion.…”
Section: Cooking and Ritualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Silvana A. Rosenfeld and Stefanie L. Bautista discuss in the introduction to this volume, identifying ritual practice in the archaeological record poses real challenges (vis. Swenson 2015), but these challenges do not only afflict Andeanists. For example, the identification of specific sets of features and artifacts at British archaeological sites as "structured deposits"-some interpreted as the product of ritual actions-has been discussed by Duncan Garrow (2012).…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%