2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaa.2013.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The architect’s signature: The social production of a residential landscape at Monte Viudo, Chachapoyas, Peru

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
12

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
19
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Across these distinct ecozones a variety of domesticated C 3 and C 4 plants are cultivated. Recent paleobotanical research (Koschmieder, 2012;Guengerich, 2014) suggests that a mix of plants were consumed at archaeological centers. Recent paleobotanical research (Koschmieder, 2012;Guengerich, 2014) suggests that a mix of plants were consumed at archaeological centers.…”
Section: Imperial Strategies In Chachapoyasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Across these distinct ecozones a variety of domesticated C 3 and C 4 plants are cultivated. Recent paleobotanical research (Koschmieder, 2012;Guengerich, 2014) suggests that a mix of plants were consumed at archaeological centers. Recent paleobotanical research (Koschmieder, 2012;Guengerich, 2014) suggests that a mix of plants were consumed at archaeological centers.…”
Section: Imperial Strategies In Chachapoyasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Chachapoya cultural fluorescence appears to have begun around AD 800 with the construction of larger, permanent communities and the coalescence of shared architectural and iconographic canons (Church & von Hagen, 2008;Guengerich, 2014). Many sites appear to have fairly long occupational sequences and consistently show evidence of the Inca arrival ca.…”
Section: The Chachapoyas Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With the advent of micro-scale household archaeology, greater variability in ancient house sites has been detected than expected from the ethnographic and ethnohistoric record and archaeological models (Allison, 2001;Carballo, 2011;Carpenter et al, 2012;De Lucia and Overholtzer, 2014;Guengerich, 2014;Kahn, 2005;Levine, 2011;Nash, 2009;Pluckhahn, 2010;Robin, 2003). This is, in part, linked to social variability, such as gradations in status and rank, including lesser ranked chiefs or lineages, gender, or occupational specialization, that is not noted in historic accounts and ethnographies.…”
Section: Household Archaeology and Defining Social Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%