2012
DOI: 10.1556/jep.10.2012.3.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The architecture of female competition: Derogation of a sexualized female news anchor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent evidence has indicated that showing women clips of a news anchor who was either more sexualized (wearing bright red lipstick and a dark jacket and skirt that accented her waist-to-hip ratio) or less sexualized (wearing no lip color and a shapeless dark-blue jacket and skirt that deemphasized her waistline) influenced trait attributions that women made of the news anchor (Grabe, Bas, Pagano, & Samson, 2012). Specifically, women who saw a sexualized woman were more likely to directly derogate her appearance effort, which reflects a negative evaluation of the target but is not necessarily an indication of aggression (i.e., behavior).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent evidence has indicated that showing women clips of a news anchor who was either more sexualized (wearing bright red lipstick and a dark jacket and skirt that accented her waist-to-hip ratio) or less sexualized (wearing no lip color and a shapeless dark-blue jacket and skirt that deemphasized her waistline) influenced trait attributions that women made of the news anchor (Grabe, Bas, Pagano, & Samson, 2012). Specifically, women who saw a sexualized woman were more likely to directly derogate her appearance effort, which reflects a negative evaluation of the target but is not necessarily an indication of aggression (i.e., behavior).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ratings of competence are also correlated with personnel selection, performance evaluation, and promotion (Cuddy, Glick, & Beninger, 2011). For example, Etcoff, Stock, Haley, Vickery, and House (2011) showed that, compared with women who wore no makeup, women who wore makeup to create natural looks (e.g., pale lipstick, skintoned eye shadow) and professional looks (e.g., brighter lipstick, contrasting eye shadow) were perceived as more competent (this relationship did not hold true for excessive amounts of makeup; Grabe, Bas, Pagano, & Samson, 2012). For example, Etcoff, Stock, Haley, Vickery, and House (2011) showed that, compared with women who wore no makeup, women who wore makeup to create natural looks (e.g., pale lipstick, skintoned eye shadow) and professional looks (e.g., brighter lipstick, contrasting eye shadow) were perceived as more competent (this relationship did not hold true for excessive amounts of makeup; Grabe, Bas, Pagano, & Samson, 2012).…”
Section: Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of appearance-enhancing items drives perceptions of competence and intelligence. For example, Etcoff, Stock, Haley, Vickery, and House (2011) showed that, compared with women who wore no makeup, women who wore makeup to create natural looks (e.g., pale lipstick, skintoned eye shadow) and professional looks (e.g., brighter lipstick, contrasting eye shadow) were perceived as more competent (this relationship did not hold true for excessive amounts of makeup; Grabe, Bas, Pagano, & Samson, 2012). Likewise, women claim that they wear makeup and clothing to increase their professional credibility (Dellinger & Williams, 1997;Roberts, 2005).…”
Section: Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that red may be a robust cue to female sexuality irrespective of the wearer’s intentions, a reality that may have undesirable real-world implications. For example, it is possible that women wearing red clothing in a non-sexual environment, such as at the workplace, may be evaluated negatively by other women (Abbey et al, 1987; Grabe, Bas, Pagano, & Samson, 2012). Likewise, red-clad women may be more likely to be perceived as a rival, may appear less approachable to other women, and may thus be more prone to social exclusion (Benenson, 2009; Vaillancourt & Sharma, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%