Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
One of the outstanding achievements of Russian science is undoubtedly the physiological underpinning of the concept of the unity of the body and its surrounding milieu, as developed by I. M. Sechenov and I. P. Pavlov.Sechenov was the first to pose the question of the reflex as an elementary act of adaptation of the body to its environmental conditions, which laid the basis for studies of the mechanisms of adaptive behavior. The ideas of Sechenov were developed by Pavlov and his school. In the 1930s, Pavlov laid down the principles for the dynamic equilibrium of the body with its environment; these reflected the central role of the nervous system in changing the behavior of the organism on adaptation to changes in its environmental conditions. There is now no doubt that there is a triad of adaptive responses: the genetic determination of an individual's nervous system, unconditioned reflexes, and conditioned reflexes. The mechanisms of these responses, their relative involvements, and their interactions in any given adaptive act remain far from completely understood. There is, however, considerable optimism that these questions will be resolved, largely because of advances in the areas of molecular-cellular and neurogenetic studies of adaptive behavior.Of the great variety of types of adaptive responses, it is logical to select a number of basic categories for studies of their underlying mechanisms. Pavlov noted that the highest form of adaptive response consists of acquisition of new habits, or learning. Learning can be non-associative or associative. Examples of non-associative learning include sensitization, acclimatization, and post-tetanic potentiation, and examples of associative learning include classical Pavlovian conditioning.A special position in adaptive behavior is held by a form of conditioning of the body to unfavorable environmental factors, such as hypoxia, toxic substances, and ecological and social stresses. However, adaptation to unfavorable factors in these cases is based on the acquisition of new habits, which involves identification of these factors followed by launching of the adaptive responses. This concept suggests the existence of specific as well as general universal molecular-cellular mechanisms of learning and adaptation to unfavorable environmental factors, and this idea is supported by experimental data.In the complex analysis of adaptive brain responses, the central position is taken by studies of the involvement in these processes of signal transduction at different levels of organization (the interneuronal, the cellular, the molecular, and the genetic) which are studied both at the level of the whole in situ brain and in comparatively simple models of neuronal networks (invertebrate nervous systems, live in vitro mammalian brain slices). Important elements of interneuronal transduction include the perception of signals and their transmission by electrical and chemical pathways to neuronal networks. A variety of neuromediator systems is responsible for the synaptic transmission of...
One of the outstanding achievements of Russian science is undoubtedly the physiological underpinning of the concept of the unity of the body and its surrounding milieu, as developed by I. M. Sechenov and I. P. Pavlov.Sechenov was the first to pose the question of the reflex as an elementary act of adaptation of the body to its environmental conditions, which laid the basis for studies of the mechanisms of adaptive behavior. The ideas of Sechenov were developed by Pavlov and his school. In the 1930s, Pavlov laid down the principles for the dynamic equilibrium of the body with its environment; these reflected the central role of the nervous system in changing the behavior of the organism on adaptation to changes in its environmental conditions. There is now no doubt that there is a triad of adaptive responses: the genetic determination of an individual's nervous system, unconditioned reflexes, and conditioned reflexes. The mechanisms of these responses, their relative involvements, and their interactions in any given adaptive act remain far from completely understood. There is, however, considerable optimism that these questions will be resolved, largely because of advances in the areas of molecular-cellular and neurogenetic studies of adaptive behavior.Of the great variety of types of adaptive responses, it is logical to select a number of basic categories for studies of their underlying mechanisms. Pavlov noted that the highest form of adaptive response consists of acquisition of new habits, or learning. Learning can be non-associative or associative. Examples of non-associative learning include sensitization, acclimatization, and post-tetanic potentiation, and examples of associative learning include classical Pavlovian conditioning.A special position in adaptive behavior is held by a form of conditioning of the body to unfavorable environmental factors, such as hypoxia, toxic substances, and ecological and social stresses. However, adaptation to unfavorable factors in these cases is based on the acquisition of new habits, which involves identification of these factors followed by launching of the adaptive responses. This concept suggests the existence of specific as well as general universal molecular-cellular mechanisms of learning and adaptation to unfavorable environmental factors, and this idea is supported by experimental data.In the complex analysis of adaptive brain responses, the central position is taken by studies of the involvement in these processes of signal transduction at different levels of organization (the interneuronal, the cellular, the molecular, and the genetic) which are studied both at the level of the whole in situ brain and in comparatively simple models of neuronal networks (invertebrate nervous systems, live in vitro mammalian brain slices). Important elements of interneuronal transduction include the perception of signals and their transmission by electrical and chemical pathways to neuronal networks. A variety of neuromediator systems is responsible for the synaptic transmission of...
According to current concepts, long-term memory is based on structural-functional changes in particular synaptic connections between neurons in the brain (synapse-specific plasticity), which depend on the processes of translation and transcription. Studies on neurons in the mollusk Aplysia and the mammalian hippocampus have addressed a mechanism of synapse-specific plasticity which does not require synapse-specific molecular genetic processes. Stimulation of a synapse has been shown to lead to activation of intracellular second messengers in the synapse as well as "synaptic tagging"--the formation of mechanisms "recognizing" transcription products. In the neuron body, second messengers induce the synthesis of RNA and protein molecules which are widely distributed in neuron processes and which are inserted selectively only into stimulation-tagged synapses, evoking long-term changes in their functional and morphological characteristics. The results of our studies on common snail defensive behavior command neurons LPl1 and RPl1 suggest the existence of another mechanism controlling synapse-specific plasticity. On acquisition of sensitization, a number of second messengers and the genes controlled by them are involved in supporting the plasticity of defined synaptic inputs of these neurons in snails. The processes of induction of long-term facilitation in the sensory inputs of neurons from chemoreceptors on the head have been shown to involve cAMP and cAMP-dependent transcription factors of the immediate early gene C/EBP (CAAT/enhancer binding protein), while the mechanisms controlling the other sensory input of neurons LPl1 and RPl1--from mechanoreceptors on the head--involve protein kinase C and protein kinase C-dependent transcription factor SRF (serum response factor). The immediate early gene zif268 is involved in controlling the inputs from both chemo-and mechanoreceptors on the head. These results are regarded as experimental support for the hypothesis that the molecular mechanisms of synapse-specific plasticity during learning may form on the basis of a selective neurochemical "projection" of the synaptic connections onto defined genes in the neuron.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.