The Arctic Water Resource Vulnerability Index: An Integrated Assessment Tool for Community Resilience and Vulnerability with Respect to Freshwater

Abstract

People in the Arctic face uncertainty in their daily lives as they contend with environmental changes at a range of scales from local to global. Freshwater is a critical resource to people, and although water resource indicators have been developed that operate from regional to global scales and for midlatitude to equatorial environments, no appropriate index exists for assessing the vulnerability of Arctic communities to changing water resources at the local scale. The Arctic Water Resource Vulnerability Index (AWRVI) is proposed as a tool that Arctic communities can use to assess their relative vulnerability-resilience to changes in their water resources from a variety of biophysical and socioeconomic processes. The AWRVI is based on a social-ecological systems perspective that includes physical and social indicators of change and is demonstrated in three case study communities/watersheds in Alaska. These results highlight the value of communities engaging in the process of using the AWRVI and the diagnostic capability of examining the suite of constituent physical and social scores rather than the total AWRVI score alone.

Resilience of Social-ecological Systems to Human Perturbation: Assessing Dongting Lake in China

“…The good economic situation of Yueyang City gives the ED area higher abilities to adapt to changes. This is in line with Rose and Liao (2005) and Alessa et al (2008) www.ccsenet.org/jsd Journal of Sustainable Development Vol. 8, No.…”

A Systematic Review of Water Vulnerability Assessment Tools

“…For example, in the context of the Water Poverty Index, Sullivan and Meigh (2007) emphasised the need for integration of biophysical and social science knowledge via iterative processes that are adaptable to different scales. Alessa et al (2008) proposed a tool for Arctic communities to assess their vulnerability and resilience in the context of water resources; the tool they discussed combines both physical and social indicators at the community/watershed scale. Most recently, Sullivan (2011, p. 627) asserts that "it is now recognised that effective water management is much more dependent on effective governance than on hydrologic regimes".…”

Sustainable Agriculture for Alaska and the Circumpolar North: Part III. Meeting the Challenges of High-Latitude Farming

“…Unlike Maxwell's (1996) focus on household food insecurity, or Barrett's (2010) focus on global food insecurity, a more salient focus for Alaska would be at the community level. A food security index similar to the Arctic Water Resources Vulnerability Index (Alessa et al, 2008) could integrate environmental, physical, and socioeconomic data from specific locations to determine a community's level of vulnerability or resilience. It would integrate data on climate, soils, farms, markets, farming costs, subsistence use, food imports, and distance from major food and supply centers to diagnose food-related issues for individual communities.…”