2015
DOI: 10.13182/fst14-794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ARIES Advanced and Conservative Tokamak Power Plant Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, significantly exceed those envisioned in recent ARIES-ACT steady-state fusion reactor studies (β N ~ β P ~ 2.5, β T~1 .5%) [34]. The large values of β N and energy confinement quality achieved in these experiments compensate for the low plasma current relative to the magnetic field, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…, significantly exceed those envisioned in recent ARIES-ACT steady-state fusion reactor studies (β N ~ β P ~ 2.5, β T~1 .5%) [34]. The large values of β N and energy confinement quality achieved in these experiments compensate for the low plasma current relative to the magnetic field, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Japan proposes a more advanced SlimCS device [18], while South Korea targets its KSTAR program on the K-DEMO device [19,20]. In the United States, the original ARIES design [9] has been updated with various 'Advanced and Conservative Tokamak' (ACT) versions [21], while proposals are also made for more compact lower power designs with ARC [22] and ST Pilot Plant [23] facilities. In addition, the AT forms the basis for various proposed fusion nuclear science testing facilities such as the Fusion Development Facility (FDF) [24] and Fusion Nuclear Science Facility (FNSF) [25][26][27] in the United States, and the China Fusion Engineering Test Reactor (CFETR) [28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a HFS antenna integrated into the blanket module has less significant LOS given that it is in a low neutron flux region. The thickness of a HFS blanket module could increase slightly (5-10 cm) to compensate for void of waveguide between the plasma facing armor and the breeding material, although some blanket designs such as those for the recent ARIES-ACT1 and ACT2 studies [27] already include a similarly sized void between the plasma facing surface and the breeding material. The ARIES-ACT1 blanket design includes inner and outer interlocking "C" shaped blanket modules with a radial gap between the blankets for divertor pumping.…”
Section: Conceptual Engineering Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%