2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2018.10.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Arrow–Hurwicz iterative finite element method for the stationary magnetohydrodynamics flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of the optimal error estimate and stability for three methods are provided rigorously. Numerical experiments are in agreement with the theoretical analysis and demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed methods, which indicate that our methods can save much computational cost than the A-H method in [40].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The analysis of the optimal error estimate and stability for three methods are provided rigorously. Numerical experiments are in agreement with the theoretical analysis and demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed methods, which indicate that our methods can save much computational cost than the A-H method in [40].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The A-H method and its theoretical analysis are the basis of the two-grid methods, which are very important in the later theoretical analysis of the two-grid A-H methods. Here, we repeat the relevant results from [40] without proofs. Let ρ and α be two positive parameters, we present the A-H method proposed in [40] as follows:…”
Section: The A-h Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations