The Arroyo Imbroglio in the Philippines

Abstract

In her seven years as Philippine president, Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo has found political legitimacy elusive. She has survived numerous travails by very effectively wielding the substantial powers of her office, but exhibits no qualms about further undermining the country's already weak political institutions. Post-Marcos Philippine democracy can boast many strengths, including a vibrant civil society, but it has been battered in recent years by a major electoral scandal, extrajudicial killings, attacks on the press, a recurrence of military adventurism, and on-going patterns of corruption and violence. The Arroyo imbroglio strains the country's longstanding but patronage-infested democratic structures, thus highlighting the necessity of well-considered political reform. A central goal should be the fostering of stronger and more programmatic political parties.

Democracy in Southeast Asia: A Year of Elections

“…In a patronage democracy like the Philippines, politicians have little allegiance to party labels and are constantly in search of the greatest access to patronage resources (Hutchcroft, ). Consequently, old coalitions die when new coalitions are formed, as Table shows.…”

State Regulation of Religion and the Quality of Governance

“…The Philippines has also elected into office presidents who largely challenged the influence of the Catholic Church in legislating domestic policy, such as Fidel Ramos (who was a Protestant) and Joseph Estrada who the Catholic Church opposed on moral grounds because of his corrupt and immoral background (Hutchcroft ). A manifestation of the decreasing influence of the Catholic Church can also be seen with the passage (by the Philippine Congress and President Benigno Aquino) of the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012 (Republic Act No.…”

Mining amid typhoons: Large-scale mining and typhoon vulnerability in the Philippines

“…The Philippines also have a society wherein there is a concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a powerful oligarchy while the majority of the population lives in poverty (Hutchcroft, 2008). Tyner (2009, p. 2) described the archipelago as a county of "haves and have-nots" and "a county of the super-rich and the abject poor."…”