“…Questions remain about where ancient peoples extracted kaolin and to what extent the clay and finished objects can be linked to Recuay political and social organization. Recuay material culture generally shows great variability, and there is no evidence for state integration, a single dominant political center, or a “capital.” The larger Recuay settlements, such as Pashash and Yayno (Grieder, 1978; Lau, 2010b), may have been influential population centers of production or distribution (c. 300–700 ce ). Both contain monumental house compounds of wealthy Recuay groups with dense built‐up cores (c. 30 ha) on hilltops, surrounded by nearby hamlets and production areas (e.g., fields, canals, corrals, and pastures).…”