The art of deceit: Pseudolus and the nature of reading

Abstract

Reading is delusion. In order to read, we have to suspend certain standards of reality and accept others; we have to offer ourselves to deceit, even if it is an act of deception of which we are acutely aware. One way of considering this paradoxical duality in the act of reading (being deceived while being aware of the deception) is more or less consciously to posit multiple levels of reading, whereby the deceived reader is watched by an aware reader, who is in turn watched by a super-reader; and so it continues. The ancient art critics, obsessed as they were with deceptive realism, provide in anecdotal form a good example of such multiplicity of perception when they tell stories of birds trying to peck at painted grapes, horses trying to mate with painted horses, even humans deceived by the lifelikeness of works of art. Such stories act as easy but potent signifiers of ‘realism’ in ancient art criticism, by showing the reactions of a ‘naive reader’ (the animals) whose deception the aware reader can enter into but also see exposed. In verbal or visual art parading itself as realistic, the artistic pretence of a pose of reality is, at some level, intended to be seen as deceptive; when it is non-realistic, or anti-realistic, or even stubbornly abstract (which it rarely is), art still demands that the reader suspend ordinary perception. But deception alone is not enough: ‘deceit’ only becomes artistic when a viewer sees through it, for a work of art which is so lifelike that no-one realizes it is not real has not entered the realm of art. The appreciation of deception happens at the moment when the deception is undone, or by the imaginative creation of a less sophisticated reader who has not seen through the deceit. That is what happens in comedy, more overtly than in other artforms, but in the same way.

Cato the Censor and the beginnings of Latin prose: from poetic translation to elite transcription

“…Plautus,. On this comedy, see also Fitzgerald 1995: 56-58;2000: 44-46;Sharrock 1996;Slater 1985]: 12-13. 94.…”

Atreus Callidus : The Tragic Afterlife of Plautus's Comic Hero

“…Feeney (2010) 288-90 notes the paradox that Pseudolus seems more believable the more he assures the audience of his untrustworthiness. See alsoSharrock (1996) 163.…”

Οι Εκτενείς Ρήσεις Στον Πλαύτο Ως Μηχανισμός Κωμικού Αποτελέσματος Και Δραματικής Συνοχής

“…133-134. 1131 ζ Sharrock (1996). 168.παθβΰυλέ 1138 ζέΝSharrock (2009) 104-1ίθ,Νη ΝαφκληάΝ βθΝ δ αΰπΰδεάΝλά βΝ κυΝPalaestrio.1139 ζ. Sharrock (2009) 10-11, Brotherton (1926εαδΝ 1141 ζέΝ Willcock (1987) 121, Wright Χ1λιζΨΝ ζγ,1154 ζέΝFeeney (2010) 283.…”