2003
DOI: 10.9783/9781934536216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Artifacts of Tikal--Utilitarian Artifacts and Unworked Material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Weaving-while most common in elite households with the greatest access to surplus female labor-was also present across the entire social spectrum. The archaeological record of Tikal shows a similar distribution, though spinning tools were found in even higher concentrations in commoner households (Moholy-Nagy 2007). This means that households may have had an entrepreneurial approach to currency production-by choosing to allocate more resources to textile production, they gave themselves a means of greater participation in an increasingly diversified marketplace, allowing them to more easily provision themselves and form wider economic relationships.…”
Section: Changing Socioeconomic Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Weaving-while most common in elite households with the greatest access to surplus female labor-was also present across the entire social spectrum. The archaeological record of Tikal shows a similar distribution, though spinning tools were found in even higher concentrations in commoner households (Moholy-Nagy 2007). This means that households may have had an entrepreneurial approach to currency production-by choosing to allocate more resources to textile production, they gave themselves a means of greater participation in an increasingly diversified marketplace, allowing them to more easily provision themselves and form wider economic relationships.…”
Section: Changing Socioeconomic Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Human hair and nails have not been found in pre-Hispanic Maya burials (e.g. Ruz Lhuillier 1973;Bell 2007;Moholy-Nagy & Coe 2008). Similarly, keratinous scutes of turtles, whether marine or freshwater, are absent from Maya archaeological sites (see Emery 2004), and this cannot be simply explained by human actions such as cooking practices that may have destroyed the shells (see Hamblin 1984: 62).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4.2;McAnany and Ebersole, 2004: 321). In the case of Tikal, several similar but more oblong artifacts made of unidentified clayed material were found in Protoclassic Burial 85 (Moholy-Nagy with Coe, 2008: fig. 223a).…”
Section: Offering 8 and Stone Spheresmentioning
confidence: 91%