2013
DOI: 10.1002/ange.201206042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The asc Trinodal Platform: Two‐Step Assembly of Triangular, Tetrahedral, and Trigonal‐Prismatic Molecular Building Blocks

Abstract: Selbstorganisation dreieckiger, tetraedrischer und trigonal‐prismatischer molekularer Baueinheiten ergibt die erste Familie trinodaler Metall‐organischer Materialien. Vier Beispiele für isoretikuläre expandierte und funktionalisierte Gerüste werden vorgestellt. Gasadsorptionsexperimente bestätigen die permanente Porosität der Stammstruktur.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, by employing hetero multitopic linkers it could be possible to prepare MM‐MOFs with metal ions of different softness/hardness that would not be formed using the most common multitopic linkers. In this way, ligands having different donor atoms can coordinate metal ions of different Lewis acidity and coordination geometry forming a MM‐MOF . MM‐MOFs in which two different metals are presented in a certain proportion range have been reported to be prepared using synthetic procedures common in MOF synthesis, such as conventional heating and solvothermal procedures .…”
Section: Synthetic Strategies For Preparation Of Mm‐mofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, by employing hetero multitopic linkers it could be possible to prepare MM‐MOFs with metal ions of different softness/hardness that would not be formed using the most common multitopic linkers. In this way, ligands having different donor atoms can coordinate metal ions of different Lewis acidity and coordination geometry forming a MM‐MOF . MM‐MOFs in which two different metals are presented in a certain proportion range have been reported to be prepared using synthetic procedures common in MOF synthesis, such as conventional heating and solvothermal procedures .…”
Section: Synthetic Strategies For Preparation Of Mm‐mofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative to the direct MM‐MOF synthesis involving the preformed metallocomplex as a linker is a two‐step procedure consisting of the preparation of a single metal MOF with the corresponding bifunctional ligand that subsequently forms the complex with a second metal ion resulting in the MM‐MOF (Figure ) . This two‐step procedure can be more general and can serve for those cases in which the preformed complex would not survive to the conditions required in a one‐pot reaction.…”
Section: Synthetic Strategies For Preparation Of Mm‐mofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Porous coordination networks (PCNs), 23,24 which comprise metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), porous coordination polymers (PCPs), 25,26 and hybrid ultramicroporous materials (HUMs), [27][28][29] exploit the modularity of their building blocks (metal ions/clusters, organic/inorganic linkers) to control topology, pore size, and pore chemistry in a manner that is infeasible for existing classes of materials. 30,31 PCNs can be readily assembled using crystal engineering principles [32][33][34][35][36] including the nodeand-linker, 37,38 molecular building block (MBB), [34][35][36]39 and supramolecular building block approaches. 40,41 Precise control over pore structure can be exerted by adjustment of the lengths, geometry, and functionality of the MBBs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%