2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.02.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Assessment of Acute Pain in Pre-Hospital Care Using Verbal Numerical Rating and Visual Analogue Scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The NRS is a self-reported pain assessment tool that has been validated in the acute (18) and, specifically, prehospital settings. (19) Secondary outcomes were: (a) Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS; score 1: anxious and agitated or restless, or both; score 2: cooperative, orientated and tranquil; score 3: responds to commands only; score 4: brisk response to painful stimuli or loud auditory stimulus; score 5: sluggish response to painful stimuli or loud auditory stimulus; and score 6: no response to painful stimuli or loud auditory stimulus) at 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes and 20 minutes; Sample size calculation was based on an equivalence test of means for the primary outcome of drop in NRS from baseline at 5 minutes for a parallel-group design. To achieve a power of 80% at 5% significance level, when the true difference in NRS drop between two arms was 0, standard deviation of the drop in NRS was 1.5 (≅ 1/6 of range 0-10) and the required equivalence limits were −0.5 to +0.5, so that a sample size of 155 for each arm was required.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NRS is a self-reported pain assessment tool that has been validated in the acute (18) and, specifically, prehospital settings. (19) Secondary outcomes were: (a) Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS; score 1: anxious and agitated or restless, or both; score 2: cooperative, orientated and tranquil; score 3: responds to commands only; score 4: brisk response to painful stimuli or loud auditory stimulus; score 5: sluggish response to painful stimuli or loud auditory stimulus; and score 6: no response to painful stimuli or loud auditory stimulus) at 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes and 20 minutes; Sample size calculation was based on an equivalence test of means for the primary outcome of drop in NRS from baseline at 5 minutes for a parallel-group design. To achieve a power of 80% at 5% significance level, when the true difference in NRS drop between two arms was 0, standard deviation of the drop in NRS was 1.5 (≅ 1/6 of range 0-10) and the required equivalence limits were −0.5 to +0.5, so that a sample size of 155 for each arm was required.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) between the no pain anchor to the point that the patient marks, providing a range of scores from 0 - 100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity ( 17 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IWN is a simple and engaging visual analogue scale that gathers information about the emotional impact of engaging in nature-based activities without requiring a high level of reading comprehension (Toews, Wagenfeld, & Stevens, 2018). Visual analogue scales have been shown to be an effective and efficient means to gather information on factors such as pain and consumer satisfaction (Abend, Dan, Maoz, Raz, & Bar-Haim, 2014;Ismail et al, 2015). They can be completed by individuals with low literacy and are less vulnerable to confounding factors than Likert scales (Rhee, Belyea, & Mammen, 2017;Voutilainen, Pitkäaho, Kvist, & Vehviläinen-Julkunen, 2016).…”
Section: Design and Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%