2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3999(02)00348-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The assessment of alexithymia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
123
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 339 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
8
123
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar or even higher magnitude correlations between the TAS-20 EOT factor scale and the TSIA and its domain and facet scales were reported in the validation studies with Canadian and German clinical samples and with the Italian mixed clinical and nonclinical sam-ple (Bagby et al, 2006;Caretti et al, 2011;Grabe et al, 2009). Given the excellent internal consistency of the EOT facet scale of the TSIA, this may be a much better measure of the externally oriented thinking facet of the alexithymia construct than the EOT factor scale of the TAS-20, which has also demonstrated low internal consistency in many other studies (e.g., Kooiman et al, 2002;Meganck et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar or even higher magnitude correlations between the TAS-20 EOT factor scale and the TSIA and its domain and facet scales were reported in the validation studies with Canadian and German clinical samples and with the Italian mixed clinical and nonclinical sam-ple (Bagby et al, 2006;Caretti et al, 2011;Grabe et al, 2009). Given the excellent internal consistency of the EOT facet scale of the TSIA, this may be a much better measure of the externally oriented thinking facet of the alexithymia construct than the EOT factor scale of the TAS-20, which has also demonstrated low internal consistency in many other studies (e.g., Kooiman et al, 2002;Meganck et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For example, Meganck et al (2008) replicated the three-factor structure and reported internal reliability coefficients that exceeded .70 for the total TAS-20 and the DIF and DDF factors in both student and psychiatric outpatient samples; however, as with several other translations of the TAS-20 (Taylor et al, 2003), Cronbach alpha coefficients were rather low for the EOT factor (.56 in the psychiatric sample and .53 in the student sample). Kooiman et al (2002) demonstrated that the TAS-20 discriminates well between psychiatric patients and adult non-patients, and has excellent three month retest reliability (r = .74).…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, Säkkinen et al (2007) confirmed the three-factor structure in a study of normal adolescents in Finland. Kooiman, Spinhoven, and Trijsburg (2002) have criticized the psychometric properties of TAS-20 but it seems that more problems arise in the use of TAS-20 in clinical samples (such as patients who somatize and psychiatric patients) than in nonclinical samples (as in our study). Our conclusion from the literature is that TAS-20 can be used in normal populations and that there is acceptable correspondence with standardized interview.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Each subscale has shown adequate internal consistency, with alpha coefficients of 0.78, 0.75, and 0.66, respectively [31]. The TAS-20 has also demonstrated good test-retest reliability in nonpatient samples across cultures [32].…”
Section: Self-report Measuresmentioning
confidence: 98%