2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The assessment of anhedonia in clinical and non-clinical populations: Further validation of the Snaith–Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
232
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 289 publications
(262 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
28
232
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that though low PA and anhedonia are empirically related with one another (rs = .20-.43;Cook, Spring, & McChargue, 2007;Franken, Rassin, & Muris, 2007;Leventhal, Waters, Kahler, Ray, & Sussman, 2009), they are not identical constructs. Indeed, it is possible for individuals to experience temporary states of low PA, but nonetheless be able to experience pleasure upon encountering a rewarding stimulus.…”
Section: The Tripartite Model Of Anxiety and Depressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that though low PA and anhedonia are empirically related with one another (rs = .20-.43;Cook, Spring, & McChargue, 2007;Franken, Rassin, & Muris, 2007;Leventhal, Waters, Kahler, Ray, & Sussman, 2009), they are not identical constructs. Indeed, it is possible for individuals to experience temporary states of low PA, but nonetheless be able to experience pleasure upon encountering a rewarding stimulus.…”
Section: The Tripartite Model Of Anxiety and Depressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possible range of scores was from 0 to 42, consistent with prior studies in which the SHAPS was used as a continuous measure. 13,14 To classify participants as hedonic or anhedonic at baseline, we followed the scoring method devised by Snaith et al 12 Each item response was recoded as hedonic (agree or definitely agree = 0) or anhedonic (disagree or definitely disagree = 1). For this dichotomous measure, scores ranged from 0 to 14.…”
Section: Anhedoniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, past studies have indicated that anhedonia measured in clinical populations can manifest itself as either an enduring personality trait 2,3 or as a transient clinical state, such as during MDD. 2 Reduced hedonic capacity may also be present in non-clinical populations [4][5][6][7][8] and, as such, can be referred to as trait anhedonia. The importance of anhedonia in psychopathology has recently been stressed by researchers who demonstrated that this symptom, together with increased stress reactivity, is an important candidate for psychopathological endophenotype of MDD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%