Wall and Melzack's Textbook of Pain 2006
DOI: 10.1016/b0-443-07287-6/50075-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The assessment of cancer pain

Nathan I. Cherny
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 197 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of acute and chronic pain in cancer patients is high: approximately 30% in patients with newly diagnosed cancer, 50–70% in patients receiving active anti‐cancer therapy and 60–80% in patients with far advanced disease (1). For most patients (up to 90%), sufficient pain relief can be obtained if adequate treatment, as suggested by various guidelines, is provided (2–5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of acute and chronic pain in cancer patients is high: approximately 30% in patients with newly diagnosed cancer, 50–70% in patients receiving active anti‐cancer therapy and 60–80% in patients with far advanced disease (1). For most patients (up to 90%), sufficient pain relief can be obtained if adequate treatment, as suggested by various guidelines, is provided (2–5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of acute and chronic pain in patients with cancer is high: approximately 30% in patients with newly diagnosed cancer, 50–70% in patients receiving active anti‐cancer therapy and 60–80% in patients with far advanced disease (1). In the majority of the patients (up to 90%), sufficient pain relief can be obtained if adequate treatment, as suggested by various guidelines, is provided (2–5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of acute and chronic pain in cancer patients is high: up to 80% of patients with far advanced disease suffer from pain 1 . The majority of these patients could be relieved from the pain if adequate treatment, as suggested by various guidelines, would be provided 2–5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To support the construct validity of the instrument, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted. In addition, relationships between the DMARS‐4 and patients' beliefs about pain management, pain communication, pain severity/relief levels and demographic variables, in particular, education and age, were assessed, as in previous studies on pain mediation adherence in cancer patients' settings such relationships have been identified 1–13,19,25 . To evaluate the reliability of the questionnaire, internal consistency of the instrument was assessed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%