2016
DOI: 10.1080/15614263.2015.1128161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The assessment of capable guardianship measures against bullying victimization in the school environment

Abstract: First I would like to thank Dr. Kyung-shick Choi for all of his hard work and dedication while helping me complete this project. The support and encouragement that he has given over that last two years has not only allowed me to jump over all the obstacles we encountered but has also allowed this thesis to be my best work. Secondly, I would like to thank my committee members: Dr. Jennifer Hartsfield and Dr. Khadija Monk who not only were willing to join my committee but who also have supported me through the e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the current study did not find evidence to support the cross-lagged impacts of delinquency/crime at an early point in time on direct/vicarious victimization at a subsequent point in time. Inconsistent with the lifestyle/routine activity perspective and some prior findings in the literature (e.g., Choi et al, 2016; Turanovic et al, 2018), neither direct victimization nor vicarious victimization at Wave 3 was influenced by involvement in deviant/criminal activities at Wave 2 or Wave 1. Third, the expected mediating role of direct victimization and vicarious victimization was not found for the association between direct and vicarious victimization experiences at an earlier point in time and delinquency/crime at a subsequent point in time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…Second, the current study did not find evidence to support the cross-lagged impacts of delinquency/crime at an early point in time on direct/vicarious victimization at a subsequent point in time. Inconsistent with the lifestyle/routine activity perspective and some prior findings in the literature (e.g., Choi et al, 2016; Turanovic et al, 2018), neither direct victimization nor vicarious victimization at Wave 3 was influenced by involvement in deviant/criminal activities at Wave 2 or Wave 1. Third, the expected mediating role of direct victimization and vicarious victimization was not found for the association between direct and vicarious victimization experiences at an earlier point in time and delinquency/crime at a subsequent point in time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…With the emphasis moved away from their law enforcement responsibilities and toward other roles, SROs might become better integrated into a school's bullying prevention efforts. However, the relationship between the presence of SROs in schools and reported bullying incidents is still unclear (Broll and Lafferty, 2018;Choi et al, 2016). Indeed, recognizing and intervening in bullying incidents is central to ensuring the health, well-being and safety of schoolchildren.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…indicate that the Islamic boarding school environment has more space than other educational institutions (public schools) (Fadilah et al, 2023;Syukur et al, 2022;Tampi et al, 2023). Strom and Choi provide an example of how the occurrence of bullying in the educational environment (verbally and non-verbally) is based on individual academic factors (having lower academic achievement than their friends) (Choi et al, 2016;Strøm et al, 2013). Furthermore, Parenting factors are one of the answers (Eşkisu, 2014;Putra et al, 2022) to bullying occurrence in Islamic boarding schools.…”
Section: Next According To Fadilah's Research Environmental Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%