2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-014-1666-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The assessment of cities’ livability integrating human wellbeing and environmental impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The research covers a number of disciplines, including ecology, geography, management, economics and environmental studies (Kennedy et al, 2011;Satterthwaite, 2008;Salim and Shafiei, 2014;Scholz and Binder, 2011). Case studies have been conducted on a variety of countries and regions, including Europe, the US, Russia and China (Barbera et al, 2010;Alnawaiseh et al, 2015;Zanella et al, 2014;Bao and Fang, 2007), with a tendency to look at watersheds, ecologically vulnerable areas, urbanized areas and metropolitan areas (Fang, 2015a;Zawar-Reza et al, 2010;Meerow and Newell, 2015). Studies have taken as their scope the world, countries, provinces, cities and parts of cities, with the main focus being cities (Luo et al, 2009;Yang et al, 2015;Anderson and O'farrell, 2012;Brown, 2012).…”
Section: The Interactive Coupling Effect Between Urbanization and Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research covers a number of disciplines, including ecology, geography, management, economics and environmental studies (Kennedy et al, 2011;Satterthwaite, 2008;Salim and Shafiei, 2014;Scholz and Binder, 2011). Case studies have been conducted on a variety of countries and regions, including Europe, the US, Russia and China (Barbera et al, 2010;Alnawaiseh et al, 2015;Zanella et al, 2014;Bao and Fang, 2007), with a tendency to look at watersheds, ecologically vulnerable areas, urbanized areas and metropolitan areas (Fang, 2015a;Zawar-Reza et al, 2010;Meerow and Newell, 2015). Studies have taken as their scope the world, countries, provinces, cities and parts of cities, with the main focus being cities (Luo et al, 2009;Yang et al, 2015;Anderson and O'farrell, 2012;Brown, 2012).…”
Section: The Interactive Coupling Effect Between Urbanization and Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking the indicator of "internet availability" as an example, since it is widely argued that the development of internet and information technology has been extensively altering our life style and changing the city's political, economic, and cultural roles in the world development [41][42][43], many cities have given great priority to the research and development of telecommunication technology in their future planning, such as Tokyo, New York, Paris, and London [35,36,44]. Thus it is necessary to incorporate this indicator into the livability evaluation system in addition to those conventional indicators, such as roads and living space that are widely used in literature [25,30]. Moreover, it is noted that due to different statistical scopes and data availability, two indicators in New York (availability of public parks and living space) are replaced by others (availability of public recreational facilities and house ownership).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods for determining the weights of scopes and indicators also differ from one another. In specific, Zanella et al [30] established their livability index through a data envelopment analysis (DEA)-based composite indicator model, which focuses more on the achievements of indicators. Tan and Thye [22] evaluated the livability based on the perspectives of ordinary persons.…”
Section: Contemporary Studies Of Livabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 presents the set of dimensions included, and the indicators selected to capture each dimension, as well as a justification for their selection. The 11 dimensions selected for the study cover all the city's characteristics proposed in the review undertaken by Lambiri et al (2007) and the indicators chosen to capture each dimension are consistent with the choices made in previous studies of QoL of cities (e.g., Ali, Malkawi, & Al-Betawi, 2009;Marans, 2012;Mercer, 2017;Morais & Camanho, 2011;Zanella, Camanho, & Dias, 2015). The reasoning behind the inclusion of each of these 11 dimensions, as well as of the choice of indicators, is briefly explained in the text that follows.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dimension transport and accessibility aims to identify the time consumed in commuting activities as it affects the QoL in cities (Zanella et al, 2015). The proximity to work releases time for leisure activities and to develop social Cities that are able to attract larger households have the conditions to ensure higher QoL (Lekwa et al, 2007).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%