1986
DOI: 10.1016/0092-1157(86)90011-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The assessment of immunity against hepatitis B after vaccination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether the slight difference in antibody levels obtained is of practical importance is unknown. It is usual to consider anti-HBs plasma levels of 10 IU/l to have a protective effect [10,11]. In our groups all participants developed antibody levels greater than 10 IU/l.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Whether the slight difference in antibody levels obtained is of practical importance is unknown. It is usual to consider anti-HBs plasma levels of 10 IU/l to have a protective effect [10,11]. In our groups all participants developed antibody levels greater than 10 IU/l.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The protective level threshold, ≥10 mIU/mL, did not originate from active immunization studies . This figure is based on the result of a passive immunization study from France, which was published in 1978 .…”
Section: Why Is the Anti‐hbs Level Of ≥10 Miu/ml Considered Protective?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serum with an anti‐HBs ≥2.1 RU was considered seropositive. Conversion from RU to mIU/mL was estimated to be 2.1 RU = 9.9 mIU/mL . According to the conversion formula, the frequency of HBV infection was 11.11% and 0.23% in individuals whose anti‐HBs levels were 10–49 mIU/mL and ≥50 mIU/mL, respectively, after a three‐dose HB vaccination series.…”
Section: Why Is the Anti‐hbs Level Of ≥10 Miu/ml Considered Protective?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations